Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-78
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
9576 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-90618 (GCVE-0-2026-90618)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-14 02:30 – Updated: 2026-09-14 15:51
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
GH05TCREW PentestAgent LocalRuntime runtime.py LocalRuntime.execute_command os command injection
Summary
A flaw has been found in GH05TCREW PentestAgent up to cf882dabea3ed91cef016cdd115e5426315665a2. This issue affects the function LocalRuntime.execute_command of the file runtime/runtime.py of the component LocalRuntime. Executing a manipulation can lead to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-14 15:50 UTC
Assigner
References
7 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/403199 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/403199/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-90618 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/914809 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/issues/91 | exploitissue-tracking |
| https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/pull/100 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GH05TCREW | PentestAgent |
Affected:
cf882dabea3ed91cef016cdd115e5426315665a2
cpe:2.3:a:gh05tcrew:pentestagent:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-90618",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T15:50:18.710598Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T15:51:40.747Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gh05tcrew:pentestagent:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"LocalRuntime"
],
"product": "PentestAgent",
"vendor": "GH05TCREW",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "cf882dabea3ed91cef016cdd115e5426315665a2"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "ez-lbz (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw has been found in GH05TCREW PentestAgent up to cf882dabea3ed91cef016cdd115e5426315665a2. This issue affects the function LocalRuntime.execute_command of the file runtime/runtime.py of the component LocalRuntime. Executing a manipulation can lead to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T02:30:11.139Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-403199 | GH05TCREW PentestAgent LocalRuntime runtime.py LocalRuntime.execute_command os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/403199"
},
{
"name": "VDB-403199 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/403199/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-90618 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-90618"
},
{
"name": "Submit #914809 | GH05TCREW pentestagent v1.0 RCE",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/914809"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/issues/91"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/pull/100"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T22:07:20.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "GH05TCREW PentestAgent LocalRuntime runtime.py LocalRuntime.execute_command os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202609"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-90618",
"datePublished": "2026-09-14T02:30:11.139Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-12T20:02:08.658Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T15:51:40.747Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-90617 (GCVE-0-2026-90617)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-14 02:15 – Updated: 2026-09-15 17:23
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
GH05TCREW PentestAgent MCP HTTP Server main.py run_task os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was detected in GH05TCREW PentestAgent up to cf882dabea3ed91cef016cdd115e5426315665a2. This vulnerability affects the function run_task of the file interface/main.py of the component MCP HTTP Server. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-15 17:23 UTC
Assigner
References
7 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/403198 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/403198/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-90617 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/914808 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/issues/90 | exploitissue-tracking |
| https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/pull/101 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GH05TCREW | PentestAgent |
Affected:
cf882dabea3ed91cef016cdd115e5426315665a2
cpe:2.3:a:gh05tcrew:pentestagent:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-90617",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-15T17:23:46.994488Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T17:23:55.488Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gh05tcrew:pentestagent:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"MCP HTTP Server"
],
"product": "PentestAgent",
"vendor": "GH05TCREW",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "cf882dabea3ed91cef016cdd115e5426315665a2"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "ez-lbz (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was detected in GH05TCREW PentestAgent up to cf882dabea3ed91cef016cdd115e5426315665a2. This vulnerability affects the function run_task of the file interface/main.py of the component MCP HTTP Server. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T02:15:10.889Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-403198 | GH05TCREW PentestAgent MCP HTTP Server main.py run_task os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/403198"
},
{
"name": "VDB-403198 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/403198/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-90617 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-90617"
},
{
"name": "Submit #914808 | GH05TCREW pentestagent v1.0 RCE",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/914808"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/issues/90"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/pull/101"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/GH05TCREW/pentestagent/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T22:07:16.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "GH05TCREW PentestAgent MCP HTTP Server main.py run_task os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202609"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-90617",
"datePublished": "2026-09-14T02:15:10.889Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-12T20:02:04.422Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T17:23:55.488Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-90492 (GCVE-0-2026-90492)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-13 01:30 – Updated: 2026-09-14 15:48
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
webgjc web_robot web.py controller_recover os command injection
Summary
A security vulnerability has been detected in webgjc web_robot 2.4.0/2.5.0/2.8.0. The affected element is the function controller_listen/controller_recover of the file py/web.py. The manipulation of the argument case_name leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-14 15:48 UTC
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/403080 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/403080/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-90492 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/892352 | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-90492",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T15:48:41.654554Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T15:48:56.296Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:webgjc:web_robot:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "web_robot",
"vendor": "webgjc",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.4.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.5.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.8.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Telqrrr (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A security vulnerability has been detected in webgjc web_robot 2.4.0/2.5.0/2.8.0. The affected element is the function controller_listen/controller_recover of the file py/web.py. The manipulation of the argument case_name leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-13T01:30:17.500Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-403080 | webgjc web_robot web.py controller_recover os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/403080"
},
{
"name": "VDB-403080 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/403080/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-90492 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-90492"
},
{
"name": "Submit #892352 | webgjc web_robot 2.8.0 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/892352"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-12T10:09:29.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "webgjc web_robot web.py controller_recover os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202609"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-90492",
"datePublished": "2026-09-13T01:30:17.500Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-12T08:03:48.661Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T15:48:56.296Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-90444 (GCVE-0-2026-90444)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-11 21:46 – Updated: 2026-10-02 21:18
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
OS Command Injection in Malcolm
Summary
A file-transfer interface that requires valid credentials accepts attacker-controlled filenames without restricting shell metacharacters. An automated process later constructs and runs a system command using the uploaded file's name, allowing an authenticated attacker to embed and execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of that process. This allows an attacker to read and modify ingested log data, and could provide a foothold for further movement within the internal network.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-14 12:51 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/de… | government-resourcevendor-advisory |
| https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/i… |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-90444",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T12:51:23.616899Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T13:00:31.121Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Malcolm",
"repo": "https://github.com/cisagov/Malcolm",
"vendor": "CISA",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "v26.06.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "v26.06.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eA file-transfer interface that requires valid credentials accepts attacker-controlled filenames without restricting shell metacharacters. An automated process later constructs and runs a system command using the uploaded file\u0027s name, allowing an authenticated attacker to embed and execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of that process. This allows an attacker to read and modify ingested log data, and could provide a foothold for further movement within the internal network.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A file-transfer interface that requires valid credentials accepts attacker-controlled filenames without restricting shell metacharacters. An automated process later constructs and runs a system command using the uploaded file\u0027s name, allowing an authenticated attacker to embed and execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of that process. This allows an attacker to read and modify ingested log data, and could provide a foothold for further movement within the internal network."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-02T21:18:08.661Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource",
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-254-01.json"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-254-01"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThe latest version of Malcolm (September 2026 or later) fixes these vulnerabilities. Affected users are encouraged to update their instance of Malcolm to the latest version.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The latest version of Malcolm (September 2026 or later) fixes these vulnerabilities. Affected users are encouraged to update their instance of Malcolm to the latest version."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-26-254-01",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection in Malcolm",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-90444",
"datePublished": "2026-09-11T21:46:07.809Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-11T21:00:07.497Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-02T21:18:08.661Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-89308 (GCVE-0-2026-89308)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-15 11:44 – Updated: 2026-09-15 12:30
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Arbitrary command execution in TrxTimeATTENDANCE
Summary
An unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists in the ping.php endpoint, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system and achieve remote code execution.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-15 12:30 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.trexom.net/sviluppo-di-app/ | product |
| https://www.acn.gov.it/portale/w/trexom-aggiornam… | government-resource |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TREXOM | TrxTimeATTENDANCE |
Affected:
1.0.5 , < 1.9.6
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:trexom:trxtimeattendance:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-89308",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-15T12:30:47.734324Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T12:30:57.222Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "TrxTimeATTENDANCE",
"vendor": "TREXOM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.9.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.5",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:trexom:trxtimeattendance:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.9.5",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.0.5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "@VolpinaRegina"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "CSIRT-IT"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan\u003eAn unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists in the\u003cspan\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003eping.php\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eendpoint, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system and achieve remote code execution.\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists in the\u00a0ping.php\u00a0endpoint, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system and achieve remote code execution."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T11:44:00.803Z",
"orgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
"shortName": "ENISA"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.trexom.net/sviluppo-di-app/"
},
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://www.acn.gov.it/portale/w/trexom-aggiornamenti-di-sicurezza"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Update to version 1.9.6"
}
],
"value": "Update to version 1.9.6"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Arbitrary command execution in TrxTimeATTENDANCE",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Block all HTTP requests to the ping.php endpoint at the web server or firewall level."
}
],
"value": "Block all HTTP requests to the ping.php endpoint at the web server or firewall level."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
"assignerShortName": "ENISA",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-89308",
"datePublished": "2026-09-15T11:44:00.803Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-11T13:54:43.619Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T12:30:57.222Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-89139 (GCVE-0-2026-89139)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-21 11:41 – Updated: 2026-09-21 15:24
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Temporal Server worker deployment compute provider executes a caller-supplied command on the Worker Service host
Summary
Temporal Server compiles a Worker Controller Instance module into its Worker Service, and that module registers a compute provider named subprocess whose function is to launch a worker by running a command on the machine hosting the Worker Service. The program name and the argument vector that provider executes are taken from the compute provider configuration supplied in the caller's request rather than from operator configuration. An authenticated caller holding only a write role in a single namespace can therefore configure a worker deployment version so that the Worker Service executes a command of the caller's choosing on its own host, under the account the server process runs as. Execution is immediate rather than deferred: the configuration handler invokes every provider using the invoke strategy directly after validating the submitted specification, so no scaling decision, task arrival, or unusual request sequence is required. Because the Worker Service process holds the persistence credentials for every namespace in the cluster and the cluster's TLS material, the consequence reaches beyond the caller's namespace to the cluster as a whole. The provider is present in the official temporal-server binaries and container images for the affected releases. The only control that can keep it unreachable is the compute provider allowlist, the per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled, and that control does not deny by default: its default value is an unset list, and the allowlist check is skipped entirely when the value is unset, so every registered compute provider is permitted, this one included. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check the following together. The deployed Temporal Server version is 1.31.0 or later and earlier than 1.31.3. The Worker Service is running, which it is in the default service set and therefore in a stock deployment. The effective per-namespace value of workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled is either unset or contains subprocess. And authorization is configured, meaning a real authorizer and claim mapper are in place; a deployment running with no authorizer already grants every caller unrestricted access to every namespace, so it has no namespace boundary for this to cross. Note that the separate per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.enabled does not gate the affected path. It defaults to false, and a deployment that has never set it in any namespace is still affected, which was confirmed by running an affected release with no value for that setting present anywhere in dynamic configuration. To look for a compute configuration that is already attached, call DescribeWorkerDeploymentVersion for each worker deployment version in each namespace and check whether any scaling group's compute provider type is subprocess.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-21 15:24 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/t… | release-notes |
| https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/t… | release-notes |
| https://github.com/temporalio/temporal-auto-scale… | patch |
| https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/12021 | patch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temporal Technologies, Inc. | Temporal Server |
Affected:
1.31.0 , < 1.31.3
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:temporal:temporal:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-89139",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-21T15:24:29.098568Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T15:24:46.549Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:temporal:temporal:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "go.temporal.io/server",
"product": "Temporal Server",
"repo": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal",
"vendor": "Temporal Technologies, Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.31.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.31.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eExploitation requires all of the following at once. The deployment runs an affected Temporal Server release with the Worker Service enabled, which is the default service set, so a stock deployment satisfies this. Authorization is configured through an authorizer and a claim mapper; without it every caller already holds unrestricted access to every namespace and there is no namespace boundary to cross. The caller holds a write role in some namespace, which is what the frontend requires to create a worker deployment version or to update a worker deployment version\u0027s compute configuration. A worker deployment is already registered in that namespace, because the create call updates an existing worker deployment rather than starting one; registering a worker deployment requires the same namespace write role the rest of the path already requires, so this adds a step without raising the privilege needed. No feature flag has to be enabled by the operator: system.enableDeploymentVersions defaults to true, the per-namespace Worker Controller component is enabled unconditionally, and the compute provider allowlist defaults to permitting every registered provider. The provider wraps the command it runs in the timeout utility, which must resolve on the host\u0027s PATH; the base image used for the official container images supplies it.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Exploitation requires all of the following at once. The deployment runs an affected Temporal Server release with the Worker Service enabled, which is the default service set, so a stock deployment satisfies this. Authorization is configured through an authorizer and a claim mapper; without it every caller already holds unrestricted access to every namespace and there is no namespace boundary to cross. The caller holds a write role in some namespace, which is what the frontend requires to create a worker deployment version or to update a worker deployment version\u0027s compute configuration. A worker deployment is already registered in that namespace, because the create call updates an existing worker deployment rather than starting one; registering a worker deployment requires the same namespace write role the rest of the path already requires, so this adds a step without raising the privilege needed. No feature flag has to be enabled by the operator: system.enableDeploymentVersions defaults to true, the per-namespace Worker Controller component is enabled unconditionally, and the compute provider allowlist defaults to permitting every registered provider. The provider wraps the command it runs in the timeout utility, which must resolve on the host\u0027s PATH; the base image used for the official container images supplies it."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Reported internally at Temporal Technologies, Inc."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eTemporal Server compiles a Worker Controller Instance module into its Worker Service, and that module registers a compute provider named subprocess whose function is to launch a worker by running a command on the machine hosting the Worker Service. The program name and the argument vector that provider executes are taken from the compute provider configuration supplied in the caller\u0027s request rather than from operator configuration. An authenticated caller holding only a write role in a single namespace can therefore configure a worker deployment version so that the Worker Service executes a command of the caller\u0027s choosing on its own host, under the account the server process runs as. Execution is immediate rather than deferred: the configuration handler invokes every provider using the invoke strategy directly after validating the submitted specification, so no scaling decision, task arrival, or unusual request sequence is required. Because the Worker Service process holds the persistence credentials for every namespace in the cluster and the cluster\u0027s TLS material, the consequence reaches beyond the caller\u0027s namespace to the cluster as a whole. The provider is present in the official temporal-server binaries and container images for the affected releases. The only control that can keep it unreachable is the compute provider allowlist, the per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled, and that control does not deny by default: its default value is an unset list, and the allowlist check is skipped entirely when the value is unset, so every registered compute provider is permitted, this one included. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check the following together. The deployed Temporal Server version is 1.31.0 or later and earlier than 1.31.3. The Worker Service is running, which it is in the default service set and therefore in a stock deployment. The effective per-namespace value of workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled is either unset or contains subprocess. And authorization is configured, meaning a real authorizer and claim mapper are in place; a deployment running with no authorizer already grants every caller unrestricted access to every namespace, so it has no namespace boundary for this to cross. Note that the separate per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.enabled does not gate the affected path. It defaults to false, and a deployment that has never set it in any namespace is still affected, which was confirmed by running an affected release with no value for that setting present anywhere in dynamic configuration. To look for a compute configuration that is already attached, call DescribeWorkerDeploymentVersion for each worker deployment version in each namespace and check whether any scaling group\u0027s compute provider type is subprocess.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Temporal Server compiles a Worker Controller Instance module into its Worker Service, and that module registers a compute provider named subprocess whose function is to launch a worker by running a command on the machine hosting the Worker Service. The program name and the argument vector that provider executes are taken from the compute provider configuration supplied in the caller\u0027s request rather than from operator configuration. An authenticated caller holding only a write role in a single namespace can therefore configure a worker deployment version so that the Worker Service executes a command of the caller\u0027s choosing on its own host, under the account the server process runs as. Execution is immediate rather than deferred: the configuration handler invokes every provider using the invoke strategy directly after validating the submitted specification, so no scaling decision, task arrival, or unusual request sequence is required. Because the Worker Service process holds the persistence credentials for every namespace in the cluster and the cluster\u0027s TLS material, the consequence reaches beyond the caller\u0027s namespace to the cluster as a whole. The provider is present in the official temporal-server binaries and container images for the affected releases. The only control that can keep it unreachable is the compute provider allowlist, the per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled, and that control does not deny by default: its default value is an unset list, and the allowlist check is skipped entirely when the value is unset, so every registered compute provider is permitted, this one included. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check the following together. The deployed Temporal Server version is 1.31.0 or later and earlier than 1.31.3. The Worker Service is running, which it is in the default service set and therefore in a stock deployment. The effective per-namespace value of workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled is either unset or contains subprocess. And authorization is configured, meaning a real authorizer and claim mapper are in place; a deployment running with no authorizer already grants every caller unrestricted access to every namespace, so it has no namespace boundary for this to cross. Note that the separate per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.enabled does not gate the affected path. It defaults to false, and a deployment that has never set it in any namespace is still affected, which was confirmed by running an affected release with no value for that setting present anywhere in dynamic configuration. To look for a compute configuration that is already attached, call DescribeWorkerDeploymentVersion for each worker deployment version in each namespace and check whether any scaling group\u0027s compute provider type is subprocess."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Command execution on the host running the Temporal Worker Service, as the operating system account the server process runs under, reachable from an ordinary namespace write role. That process holds the persistence credentials for every namespace in the cluster as well as the cluster\u0027s TLS material, so the effect is cross-namespace and cluster-wide rather than confined to the caller\u0027s own namespace. In the official container image the server runs as an unprivileged account rather than root, which bounds host takeover but does not bound access to the credentials and key material the server process itself holds."
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-749",
"description": "CWE-749: Exposed Dangerous Method or Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1188",
"description": "CWE-1188: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T11:41:23.342Z",
"orgId": "61241ed8-fa44-4f23-92db-b8c443751968",
"shortName": "Temporal"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "First fixed release",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.32.0"
},
{
"name": "Temporal Server 1.31.3, first fixed 1.31 release",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.31.3"
},
{
"name": "Fix pull request, compute provider allowlist changed to deny by default",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal-auto-scaled-workers/pull/129"
},
{
"name": "Module bump carrying the fix into the Temporal Server 1.32 release branch",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/12021"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eUpgrade to Temporal Server 1.32.0 or 1.31.3. Both pin a Worker Controller Instance module revision whose compute provider allowlist denies by default instead of permitting every registered provider. Operators who cannot upgrade immediately can apply the workaround below, which closes the same path without waiting for a release. The 1.30 release line does not depend on the Worker Controller Instance module at all and is unaffected. Note that the change shipped in 1.32.0 and 1.31.3 makes the allowlist deny by default and does not change where the executed command comes from: for a compute provider an operator does deliberately add to the allowlist, the program name and argument vector still arrive in the caller\u0027s request.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade to Temporal Server 1.32.0 or 1.31.3. Both pin a Worker Controller Instance module revision whose compute provider allowlist denies by default instead of permitting every registered provider. Operators who cannot upgrade immediately can apply the workaround below, which closes the same path without waiting for a release. The 1.30 release line does not depend on the Worker Controller Instance module at all and is unaffected. Note that the change shipped in 1.32.0 and 1.31.3 makes the allowlist deny by default and does not change where the executed command comes from: for a compute provider an operator does deliberately add to the allowlist, the program name and argument vector still arrive in the caller\u0027s request."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Temporal Server worker deployment compute provider executes a caller-supplied command on the Worker Service host",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eSet the per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled to an explicit list naming only the compute providers the deployment intends to permit, omitting subprocess. An explicit empty list denies every compute provider. Leaving the setting unset is what permits everything, because the allowlist check is skipped when no value is configured; giving the setting any explicit value, an empty list included, makes the check run and denies any provider absent from the list. The request is then rejected with InvalidArgument before the provider runs. This is dynamic configuration, so it takes effect without restarting the server and is available during an incident rather than only at a maintenance window. Verify the effective value for every namespace in scope, including any namespace-constrained entries that could override a cluster-wide value.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Set the per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled to an explicit list naming only the compute providers the deployment intends to permit, omitting subprocess. An explicit empty list denies every compute provider. Leaving the setting unset is what permits everything, because the allowlist check is skipped when no value is configured; giving the setting any explicit value, an empty list included, makes the check run and denies any provider absent from the list. The request is then rejected with InvalidArgument before the provider runs. This is dynamic configuration, so it takes effect without restarting the server and is available during an incident rather than only at a maintenance window. Verify the effective value for every namespace in scope, including any namespace-constrained entries that could override a cluster-wide value."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "61241ed8-fa44-4f23-92db-b8c443751968",
"assignerShortName": "Temporal",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-89139",
"datePublished": "2026-09-21T11:41:23.342Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T23:08:25.314Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T15:24:46.549Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-89066 (GCVE-0-2026-89066)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-11 16:05 – Updated: 2026-09-11 16:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
OS command injection in the task synthesis component in projen
Summary
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command in the task synthesis component in projen before 0.103.0 might allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands on a developer workstation or continuous integration runner via shell metacharacters in project configuration values and repository file names that are interpolated into generated task definitions.
To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.103.0 and then re-synthesize the project so that .projen/tasks.json is regenerated with the corrected task definitions. Upgrading alone is not sufficient because the generated task definition file is committed to the repository.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-11 16:20 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/projen/projen/releases/tag/v0.103.0 | patch |
| https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletin… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/projen/projen/security/advisor… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-89066",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-11T16:20:54.930694Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T16:21:02.834Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "projen",
"vendor": "AWS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.103.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:aws:projen:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "0.103.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command in the task synthesis component in projen before 0.103.0 might allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands on a developer workstation or continuous integration runner via shell metacharacters in project configuration values and repository file names that are interpolated into generated task definitions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.103.0 and then re-synthesize the project so that \u003ccode\u003e.projen/tasks.json\u003c/code\u003e is regenerated with the corrected task definitions. Upgrading alone is not sufficient because the generated task definition file is committed to the repository.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command in the task synthesis component in projen before 0.103.0 might allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands on a developer workstation or continuous integration runner via shell metacharacters in project configuration values and repository file names that are interpolated into generated task definitions.\n\n\n\nTo remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.103.0 and then re-synthesize the project so that .projen/tasks.json is regenerated with the corrected task definitions. Upgrading alone is not sufficient because the generated task definition file is committed to the repository."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-6",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-6 Argument Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-88",
"description": "CWE-88 Improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command (\u0027argument injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T16:07:57.337Z",
"orgId": "ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5",
"shortName": "AMZN"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/projen/projen/releases/tag/v0.103.0"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/2026-108-aws/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/projen/projen/security/advisories/GHSA-q6g4-h6vc-vqm8"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OS command injection in the task synthesis component in projen",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5",
"assignerShortName": "AMZN",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-89066",
"datePublished": "2026-09-11T16:05:42.284Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T18:44:43.656Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T16:21:02.834Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-89010 (GCVE-0-2026-89010)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-11 14:57 – Updated: 2026-09-11 16:16 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
WAVLINK WN535M1/WN535M3 Unauthenticated OS Command Injection via sync_server
Summary
WAVLINK WN535M1 and WN535M3 routers running firmware prior to M35M1_V250922 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root by sending crafted filenames to the sync_server daemon on TCP port 13136. The daemon interpolates attacker-controlled filename input containing shell metacharacters into a shell command string via sprintf() and passes it to system() without sanitization, enabling root-level command execution on the device.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-11 16:15 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/camdsmith/wavlink-sync_server-… | technical-descriptionexploit |
| https://docs.wavlink.xyz/ | productpatch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/wavlink-wn53… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAVLINK Technology | WN535M1 |
Affected:
M35M1_V210223
(custom)
Unaffected: M35M1_V250922 (custom) |
|
| WAVLINK Technology | WN535M3 |
Affected:
M35M1_V210223
(custom)
Unaffected: M35M1_V250922 (custom) |
Date Public
2026-08-11 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-89010",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-11T16:15:46.679517Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T16:16:03.207Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "WN535M1",
"vendor": "WAVLINK Technology",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "M35M1_V210223",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "M35M1_V250922",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "WN535M3",
"vendor": "WAVLINK Technology",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "M35M1_V210223",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "M35M1_V250922",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Cameron Smith"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "WAVLINK WN535M1 and WN535M3 routers running firmware prior to M35M1_V250922 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root by sending crafted filenames to the sync_server daemon on TCP port 13136. The daemon interpolates attacker-controlled filename input containing shell metacharacters into a shell command string via sprintf() and passes it to system() without sanitization, enabling root-level command execution on the device."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T14:58:59.087Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Researcher Disclosure",
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/camdsmith/wavlink-sync_server-rce/blob/main/README.md"
},
{
"name": "WAVLINK ROUTER-Center",
"tags": [
"product",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://docs.wavlink.xyz/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/wavlink-wn535m1-wn535m3-unauthenticated-os-command-injection-via-sync-server"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"title": "WAVLINK WN535M1/WN535M3 Unauthenticated OS Command Injection via sync_server",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-89010",
"datePublished": "2026-09-11T14:57:56.223Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T16:23:54.470Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T16:16:03.207Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-88889 (GCVE-0-2026-88889)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-10 13:05 – Updated: 2026-09-29 22:10
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Renovate before 44.14.7 Command Injection via distributionType
Summary
Renovate before 44.14.7 contains a command injection vulnerability in the Maven Wrapper manager that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by specifying a malicious distributionType parameter in maven-wrapper.properties. Attackers can inject shell commands through unescaped distributionType values to achieve remote code execution when Renovate processes Maven Wrapper updates in binarySource=docker mode.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-10 15:05 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/security/… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/renovate-bef… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| renovatebot | renovate |
Affected:
0 , < 44.14.7
(semver)
Unaffected: 44.14.7 (semver) |
|
| mend | renovate-ce |
Affected:
0 , < 15.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 15.4.0 (semver) |
|
| mend | renovate-ee-server |
Affected:
0 , < 15.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 15.4.0 (semver) |
|
| mend | renovate-ee-worker |
Affected:
0 , < 15.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 15.4.0 (semver) |
|
| mend | mend-renovate-ce |
Affected:
0 , < 15.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 15.4.0 (semver) |
|
| mend | mend-renovate-enterprise-edition |
Affected:
0 , < 10.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 10.4.0 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-08-27 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-88889",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T15:05:17.410712Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-10T15:05:38.515Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "renovate",
"vendor": "renovatebot",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "44.14.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "44.14.7",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "renovate-ce",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "15.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "renovate-ee-server",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "15.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "renovate-ee-worker",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "15.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "mend-renovate-ce",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "15.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "mend-renovate-enterprise-edition",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "10.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "iaohkut-from-NightWolf-Team"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "iabdullah215"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Renovate before 44.14.7 contains a command injection vulnerability in the Maven Wrapper manager that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by specifying a malicious distributionType parameter in maven-wrapper.properties. Attackers can inject shell commands through unescaped distributionType values to achieve remote code execution when Renovate processes Maven Wrapper updates in binarySource=docker mode."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T22:10:43.498Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-f2v7-35mm-3hx7)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/security/advisories/GHSA-f2v7-35mm-3hx7"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Renovate before 44.14.7 Command Injection via distributionType",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/renovate-before-44.14.7-command-injection-via-distributiontype"
}
],
"title": "Renovate before 44.14.7 Command Injection via distributionType",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-88889",
"datePublished": "2026-09-10T13:05:38.147Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T11:25:34.912Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T22:10:43.498Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-88888 (GCVE-0-2026-88888)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-10 13:05 – Updated: 2026-09-29 22:10
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Renovate before 44.14.7 Command Injection via Mix organization
Summary
Renovate before 44.14.7 contains a command injection vulnerability in the Mix manager when processing private dependencies with unescaped organization parameters. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters through malicious package names to execute arbitrary commands as the Renovate user in binarySource=docker mode.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-10 14:24 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/security/… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/renovate-bef… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| renovatebot | renovate |
Affected:
0 , < 44.14.7
(semver)
Unaffected: 44.14.7 (semver) |
|
| mend | renovate-ce |
Affected:
0 , < 15.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 15.4.0 (semver) |
|
| mend | renovate-ee-server |
Affected:
0 , < 15.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 15.4.0 (semver) |
|
| mend | renovate-ee-worker |
Affected:
0 , < 15.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 15.4.0 (semver) |
|
| mend | mend-renovate-ce |
Affected:
0 , < 15.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 15.4.0 (semver) |
|
| mend | mend-renovate-enterprise-edition |
Affected:
0 , < 10.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 10.4.0 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-08-27 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-88888",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T14:24:48.266344Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-10T14:55:44.279Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "renovate",
"vendor": "renovatebot",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "44.14.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "44.14.7",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "renovate-ce",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "15.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "renovate-ee-server",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "15.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "renovate-ee-worker",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "15.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "mend-renovate-ce",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "15.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "15.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "mend-renovate-enterprise-edition",
"vendor": "mend",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "10.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "iabdullah215"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "iaohkut-from-NightWolf-Team"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Renovate before 44.14.7 contains a command injection vulnerability in the Mix manager when processing private dependencies with unescaped organization parameters. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters through malicious package names to execute arbitrary commands as the Renovate user in binarySource=docker mode."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T22:10:42.810Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-v85g-rq5w-c46q)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/security/advisories/GHSA-v85g-rq5w-c46q"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Renovate before 44.14.7 Command Injection via Mix organization",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/renovate-before-44.14.7-command-injection-via-mix-organization"
}
],
"title": "Renovate before 44.14.7 Command Injection via Mix organization",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-88888",
"datePublished": "2026-09-10T13:05:37.458Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T11:25:34.912Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T22:10:42.810Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-4.3
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Implementation
If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation MIT-29
Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation
Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.