Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-606
AllowedUnchecked Input for Loop Condition
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not properly check inputs that are used for loop conditions, potentially leading to a denial of service or other consequences because of excessive looping.
79 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2023-6237 (GCVE-0-2023-6237)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-04-25 06:27 – Updated: 2026-05-12 10:41
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take
a long time.
Impact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()
to check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that
is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead
to a Denial of Service.
When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,
a computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.
For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this
computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,
then this computation would take a long time.
An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key
obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service
attack.
The function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL
functions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line
application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used
with the '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2024-08-20 14:44 UTC
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Assigner
References
10 references
Impacted products
Date Public
2024-01-15 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T08:21:18.096Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240115.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/18c02492138d1eb8b6548cb26e7b625fb2414a2a"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a830f551557d3d66a84bbb18a5b889c640c36294"
},
{
"name": "3.2.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0b0f7abfb37350794a4b8960fafc292cd5d1b84d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/11/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240531-0007/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-6237",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-08-20T14:44:52.382969Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-01T14:28:51.338Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SINEC NMS",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.0 SP1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T10:41:05.568Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331112.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-915275.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "OSS-Fuzz"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take\u003cbr\u003ea long time.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()\u003cbr\u003eto check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that\u003cbr\u003eis being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead\u003cbr\u003eto a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhen function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,\u003cbr\u003ea computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.\u003cbr\u003eFor valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this\u003cbr\u003ecomputation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,\u003cbr\u003ethen this computation would take a long time.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key\u003cbr\u003eobtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service\u003cbr\u003eattack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL\u003cbr\u003efunctions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line\u003cbr\u003eapplication. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used\u003cbr\u003ewith the \u0027-pubin\u0027 and \u0027-check\u0027 options on untrusted data.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take\na long time.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nto check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that\nis being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead\nto a Denial of Service.\n\nWhen function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,\na computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.\nFor valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this\ncomputation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,\nthen this computation would take a long time.\n\nAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key\nobtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service\nattack.\n\nThe function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL\nfunctions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line\napplication. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used\nwith the \u0027-pubin\u0027 and \u0027-check\u0027 options on untrusted data.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:56.955Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240115.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/18c02492138d1eb8b6548cb26e7b625fb2414a2a"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a830f551557d3d66a84bbb18a5b889c640c36294"
},
{
"name": "3.2.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0b0f7abfb37350794a4b8960fafc292cd5d1b84d"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-6237",
"datePublished": "2024-04-25T06:27:26.990Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-11-21T10:16:34.346Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T10:41:05.568Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2023-5678 (GCVE-0-2023-5678)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-11-06 15:47 – Updated: 2026-05-12 10:32
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Excessive time spent in DH check / generation with large Q parameter value
Summary
Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking
excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to
generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications
that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()
to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.
Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from
an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),
DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore
vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.
Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large
P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q.
An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and
supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be
vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of
other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other
functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this
are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the
"-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-12-02 19:42 UTC
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Assigner
References
21 references
Impacted products
10 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
Affected:
1.0.2 , < 1.0.2zj
(custom)
Affected: 1.1.1 , < 1.1.1x (custom) Affected: 3.0.0 , < 3.0.13 (semver) Affected: 3.1.0 , < 3.1.5 (semver) |
|
| Siemens | RUGGEDCOM RST2428P |
Unaffected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family |
Unaffected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family |
Unaffected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIDIS Prime |
Affected:
0 , < V4.0.700
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SINEC NMS |
Affected:
0 , < V3.0 SP1
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.0 , < V3.1.5
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.0 , < V3.1.5
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.0 , < V3.1.5
(custom)
|
Date Public
2023-11-06 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:50:41.915Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231106.txt"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zj git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=34efaef6c103d636ab507a0cc34dca4d3aecc055"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1x git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=710fee740904b6290fef0dd5536fbcedbc38ff0c"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db925ae2e65d0d925adef429afc37f75bd1c2017"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddeb4b6c6d527e54ce9a99cba785c0f7776e54b6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231130-0010/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/11/1"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-5678",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-02T19:42:37.122304Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T19:42:55.034Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIDIS Prime",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V4.0.700",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SINEC NMS",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.0 SP1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T10:32:15.801Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794697.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-128433.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-556635.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-093430.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-341067.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331112.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-915275.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-277137.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zj",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1x",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "David Benjamin (Google)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Richard Levitte"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-11-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking\u003cbr\u003eexcessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to\u003cbr\u003egenerate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications\u003cbr\u003ethat use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\u003cbr\u003eto check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.\u003cbr\u003eWhere the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from\u003cbr\u003ean untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),\u003cbr\u003eDH_check_pub_key() doesn\u0027t make any of these checks, and is therefore\u003cbr\u003evulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLikewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large\u003cbr\u003eP, it doesn\u0027t check for an excessively large Q.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and\u003cbr\u003esupplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\u003cbr\u003evulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of\u003cbr\u003eother OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other\u003cbr\u003efunctions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this\u003cbr\u003eare DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the\u003cbr\u003e\"-pubcheck\" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking\nexcessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to\ngenerate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications\nthat use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nto check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.\nWhere the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from\nan untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nWhile DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),\nDH_check_pub_key() doesn\u0027t make any of these checks, and is therefore\nvulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.\n\nLikewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large\nP, it doesn\u0027t check for an excessively large Q.\n\nAn application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and\nsupplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\nvulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nDH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of\nother OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other\nfunctions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this\nare DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the\n\"-pubcheck\" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "LOW"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:53.778Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231106.txt"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zj git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=34efaef6c103d636ab507a0cc34dca4d3aecc055"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1x git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=710fee740904b6290fef0dd5536fbcedbc38ff0c"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db925ae2e65d0d925adef429afc37f75bd1c2017"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddeb4b6c6d527e54ce9a99cba785c0f7776e54b6"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent in DH check / generation with large Q parameter value",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-5678",
"datePublished": "2023-11-06T15:47:30.795Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-10-20T09:38:43.518Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T10:32:15.801Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2023-3817 (GCVE-0-2023-3817)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-07-31 15:34 – Updated: 2025-05-05 15:53
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()
or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long
delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained
from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing
CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger
an overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,
if present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is
unnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.
An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained
from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.
An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.
The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and
EVP_PKEY_param_check().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the "-check" option.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-04-23 13:26 UTC
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Assigner
References
15 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt | vendor-advisory |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1 | x_transferred |
| https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023… | x_transferred |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2023081… | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/9 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/0… | x_transferred |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2023102… | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/06/2 | x_transferred |
| https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 | x_transferred |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2024062… | x_transferred |
Impacted products
Date Public
2023-07-31 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:08:50.496Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a1eb62c29db6cb5eec707f9338aee00f44e26f5"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9002fd07327a91f35ba6c1307e71fa6fd4409b7f"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=91ddeba0f2269b017dc06c46c993a788974b1aa5"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=869ad69aadd985c7b8ca6f4e5dd0eb274c9f3644"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230818-0014/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/11"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0008/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/06/2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-3817",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:26:20.624850Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T15:53:49.014Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1v",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zi",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Bernd Edlinger"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-07-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\u003cbr\u003edelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing\u003cbr\u003eCVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger\u003cbr\u003ean overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,\u003cbr\u003eif present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is\u003cbr\u003eunnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\u003cbr\u003eAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\u003cbr\u003eThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\u003cbr\u003eEVP_PKEY_param_check().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the \"-check\" option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing\nCVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger\nan overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,\nif present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is\nunnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.\n\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \"-check\" option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:48.907Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a1eb62c29db6cb5eec707f9338aee00f44e26f5"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9002fd07327a91f35ba6c1307e71fa6fd4409b7f"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=91ddeba0f2269b017dc06c46c993a788974b1aa5"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=869ad69aadd985c7b8ca6f4e5dd0eb274c9f3644"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-3817",
"datePublished": "2023-07-31T15:34:13.627Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-07-21T08:47:25.638Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T15:53:49.014Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-3446 (GCVE-0-2023-3446)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-07-19 11:31 – Updated: 2025-04-23 16:20
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()
or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long
delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained
from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those
checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use
a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which
is over 10,000 bits in length.
However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters
that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value
even if it has already been found to be too large.
An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained
from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.
The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.
An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.
The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and
EVP_PKEY_param_check().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the '-check' option.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-04-23 13:26 UTC
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Assigner
References
13 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt | vendor-advisory |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=c… | patch |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/4 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/6 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1 | x_transferred |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2023080… | x_transferred |
| https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023… | x_transferred |
| https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 | x_transferred |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/1 | x_transferred |
Impacted products
Date Public
2023-07-13 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T06:55:03.577Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/4"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230803-0011/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-3446",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:26:22.087194Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:20:00.400Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1v",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zi",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "OSSfuzz"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Matt Caswell"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\u003cbr\u003edelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\u003cbr\u003echecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\u003cbr\u003ea very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\u003cbr\u003eis over 10,000 bits in length.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\u003cbr\u003ethat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\u003cbr\u003eeven if it has already been found to be too large.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\u003cbr\u003eAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\u003cbr\u003eThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\u003cbr\u003eEVP_PKEY_param_check().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\n\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\n\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:47.238Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-3446",
"datePublished": "2023-07-19T11:31:34.994Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-06-28T14:21:39.968Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:20:00.400Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-3252 (GCVE-0-2022-3252)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-09-21 18:45 – Updated: 2024-08-03 01:07
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Improper detection of complete HTTP body decompression SwiftNIO Extras provides a pair of helpers for transparently decompressing received HTTP request or response bodies. These two objects (HTTPRequestDecompressor and HTTPResponseDecompressor) both failed to detect when the decompressed body was considered complete. If trailing junk data was appended to the HTTP message body, the code would repeatedly attempt to decompress this data and fail. This would lead to an infinite loop making no forward progress, leading to livelock of the system and denial-of-service. This issue can be triggered by any attacker capable of sending a compressed HTTP message. Most commonly this is HTTP servers, as compressed HTTP messages cannot be negotiated for HTTP requests, but it is possible that users have configured decompression for HTTP requests as well. The attack is low effort, and likely to be reached without requiring any privilege or system access. The impact on availability is high: the process immediately becomes unavailable but does not immediately crash, meaning that it is possible for the process to remain in this state until an administrator intervenes or an automated circuit breaker fires. If left unchecked this issue will very slowly exhaust memory resources due to repeated buffer allocation, but the buffers are not written to and so it is possible that the processes will not terminate for quite some time. This risk can be mitigated by removing transparent HTTP message decompression. The issue is fixed by correctly detecting the termination of the compressed body as reported by zlib and refusing to decompress further data. The issue was found by Vojtech Rylko (https://github.com/vojtarylko) and reported publicly on GitHub.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/securit… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swift Project | SwiftNIO Extras |
Affected:
unspecified , < 1.14.0
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:07:05.521Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "SwiftNIO Extras",
"vendor": "Swift Project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.14.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper detection of complete HTTP body decompression SwiftNIO Extras provides a pair of helpers for transparently decompressing received HTTP request or response bodies. These two objects (HTTPRequestDecompressor and HTTPResponseDecompressor) both failed to detect when the decompressed body was considered complete. If trailing junk data was appended to the HTTP message body, the code would repeatedly attempt to decompress this data and fail. This would lead to an infinite loop making no forward progress, leading to livelock of the system and denial-of-service. This issue can be triggered by any attacker capable of sending a compressed HTTP message. Most commonly this is HTTP servers, as compressed HTTP messages cannot be negotiated for HTTP requests, but it is possible that users have configured decompression for HTTP requests as well. The attack is low effort, and likely to be reached without requiring any privilege or system access. The impact on availability is high: the process immediately becomes unavailable but does not immediately crash, meaning that it is possible for the process to remain in this state until an administrator intervenes or an automated circuit breaker fires. If left unchecked this issue will very slowly exhaust memory resources due to repeated buffer allocation, but the buffers are not written to and so it is possible that the processes will not terminate for quite some time. This risk can be mitigated by removing transparent HTTP message decompression. The issue is fixed by correctly detecting the termination of the compressed body as reported by zlib and refusing to decompress further data. The issue was found by Vojtech Rylko (https://github.com/vojtarylko) and reported publicly on GitHub."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-09-21T18:45:16.000Z",
"orgId": "e4a1ddda-f4f5-496e-96c8-82c37d06abd0",
"shortName": "Swift"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmf"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@forums.swift.org",
"ID": "CVE-2022-3252",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "SwiftNIO Extras",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_value": "1.14.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Swift Project"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Improper detection of complete HTTP body decompression SwiftNIO Extras provides a pair of helpers for transparently decompressing received HTTP request or response bodies. These two objects (HTTPRequestDecompressor and HTTPResponseDecompressor) both failed to detect when the decompressed body was considered complete. If trailing junk data was appended to the HTTP message body, the code would repeatedly attempt to decompress this data and fail. This would lead to an infinite loop making no forward progress, leading to livelock of the system and denial-of-service. This issue can be triggered by any attacker capable of sending a compressed HTTP message. Most commonly this is HTTP servers, as compressed HTTP messages cannot be negotiated for HTTP requests, but it is possible that users have configured decompression for HTTP requests as well. The attack is low effort, and likely to be reached without requiring any privilege or system access. The impact on availability is high: the process immediately becomes unavailable but does not immediately crash, meaning that it is possible for the process to remain in this state until an administrator intervenes or an automated circuit breaker fires. If left unchecked this issue will very slowly exhaust memory resources due to repeated buffer allocation, but the buffers are not written to and so it is possible that the processes will not terminate for quite some time. This risk can be mitigated by removing transparent HTTP message decompression. The issue is fixed by correctly detecting the termination of the compressed body as reported by zlib and refusing to decompress further data. The issue was found by Vojtech Rylko (https://github.com/vojtarylko) and reported publicly on GitHub."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmf"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e4a1ddda-f4f5-496e-96c8-82c37d06abd0",
"assignerShortName": "Swift",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-3252",
"datePublished": "2022-09-21T18:45:16.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-09-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:07:05.521Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2019-25624 (GCVE-0-2019-25624)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-23 13:48 – Updated: 2026-03-24 15:14
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Liquid Studio 2.17 Denial of Service via Malformed Input
Summary
Liquid Studio 2.17 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by providing malformed input through the keyboard interface. Attackers can trigger the vulnerability by entering arbitrary characters during application runtime, causing the application to become unresponsive or terminate abnormally.
Severity
6.2 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-03-24 14:01 UTC
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46128 | exploit |
| http://www.pixarra.com/ | product |
| http://www.pixarra.com/uploads/9/4/6/3/94635436/t… | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/liquid-studi… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixarra | Liquid Studio |
Affected:
2.17
|
Date Public
2019-01-11 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2019-25624",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-24T14:01:08.489303Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-24T15:14:04.055Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Liquid Studio",
"vendor": "Pixarra",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.17"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Ihsan Sencan"
}
],
"datePublic": "2019-01-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Liquid Studio 2.17 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by providing malformed input through the keyboard interface. Attackers can trigger the vulnerability by entering arbitrary characters during application runtime, causing the application to become unresponsive or terminate abnormally."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-23T13:48:39.597Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "ExploitDB-46128",
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46128"
},
{
"name": "Official Product Homepage",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "http://www.pixarra.com/"
},
{
"name": "Product Reference",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "http://www.pixarra.com/uploads/9/4/6/3/94635436/tbliquidstudio_install.exe"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Liquid Studio 2.17 Denial of Service via Malformed Input",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/liquid-studio-denial-of-service-via-malformed-input"
}
],
"title": "Liquid Studio 2.17 Denial of Service via Malformed Input",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2019-25624",
"datePublished": "2026-03-23T13:48:39.597Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-23T13:46:26.421Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-24T15:14:04.055Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
GHSA-2CJ7-MG3X-9MHQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-06 18:30 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:31
VLAI
Details
Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.
Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q.
An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the "-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
Severity
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-5678"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-606",
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-11-06T16:15:42Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking\nexcessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to\ngenerate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications\nthat use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nto check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.\nWhere the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from\nan untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nWhile DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),\nDH_check_pub_key() doesn\u0027t make any of these checks, and is therefore\nvulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.\n\nLikewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large\nP, it doesn\u0027t check for an excessively large Q.\n\nAn application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and\nsupplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\nvulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nDH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of\nother OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other\nfunctions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this\nare DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the\n\"-pubcheck\" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-2cj7-mg3x-9mhq",
"modified": "2026-05-12T12:31:34Z",
"published": "2023-11-06T18:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231106.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231130-0010"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddeb4b6c6d527e54ce9a99cba785c0f7776e54b6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db925ae2e65d0d925adef429afc37f75bd1c2017"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=710fee740904b6290fef0dd5536fbcedbc38ff0c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=34efaef6c103d636ab507a0cc34dca4d3aecc055"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-915275.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794697.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-556635.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-341067.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331112.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-277137.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-128433.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-093430.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/06/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/11/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2JCM-HQ8R-84WX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-11 00:32 – Updated: 2026-09-01 17:16
VLAI
Summary
kafka-python vulnerable to denial of service through an unbounded SCRAM iteration count
Details
kafka-python prior to 2.3.2 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability in SCRAM authentication handling that allows a malicious or machine-in-the-middle broker to freeze the client event loop by supplying an excessively large iteration count. In scram.py, ScramClient.process_server_first_message() passes the broker-controlled SCRAM iteration count directly to hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac() without validation, blocking producer sends, consumer polls, admin operations, and heartbeats, which can cause consumer group eviction and repeated reconnect failures.
Severity
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "kafka-python"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-10143"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400",
"CWE-606"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-01T17:16:18Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-10T22:16:55Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "kafka-python prior to 2.3.2 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability in SCRAM authentication handling that allows a malicious or machine-in-the-middle broker to freeze the client event loop by supplying an excessively large iteration count. In scram.py, ScramClient.process_server_first_message() passes the broker-controlled SCRAM iteration count directly to hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac() without validation, blocking producer sends, consumer polls, admin operations, and heartbeats, which can cause consumer group eviction and repeated reconnect failures.",
"id": "GHSA-2jcm-hq8r-84wx",
"modified": "2026-09-01T17:16:18Z",
"published": "2026-06-11T00:32:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-10143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dpkp/kafka-python/pull/3026"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dpkp/kafka-python/pull/3019"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dpkp/kafka-python/commit/74400d7ef1b54ad24d4b8170c23b58d1cab65e4f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dpkp/kafka-python/commit/6e4831444f972d169cdd11f5c8d50333cea3f19b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/kafka-python-prior-to-dos-via-scram-iteration-count-in-scram-py"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-10143.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/kafka-python/PYSEC-2026-2191.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dpkp/kafka-python/releases/tag/2.3.2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/dpkp/kafka-python"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2487722"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-10143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42796"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41066"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33683"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30076"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28571"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "kafka-python vulnerable to denial of service through an unbounded SCRAM iteration count"
}
GHSA-2PJM-RCHF-GXMP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-20 15:35 – Updated: 2026-05-20 15:35
VLAI
Details
An unbounded resend loop vulnerability exists in the BIND 9 resolver state machine during bad-server handling, enabling a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause severe resource exhaustion by sending queries that trigger specific retry conditions. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.36 through 9.18.48, 9.20.8 through 9.20.22, 9.21.7 through 9.21.21, 9.18.36-S1 through 9.18.48-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.22-S1.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-5950"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-606"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-20T13:16:40Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An unbounded resend loop vulnerability exists in the BIND 9 resolver state machine during bad-server handling, enabling a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause severe resource exhaustion by sending queries that trigger specific retry conditions.\nThis issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.36 through 9.18.48, 9.20.8 through 9.20.22, 9.21.7 through 9.21.21, 9.18.36-S1 through 9.18.48-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.22-S1.",
"id": "GHSA-2pjm-rchf-gxmp",
"modified": "2026-05-20T15:35:33Z",
"published": "2026-05-20T15:35:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-5950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.18.49"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.20.23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.21.22"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-5950"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2RV5-PWGG-7F73
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-23 15:30 – Updated: 2026-03-23 15:30
VLAI
Details
Liquid Studio 2.17 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by providing malformed input through the keyboard interface. Attackers can trigger the vulnerability by entering arbitrary characters during application runtime, causing the application to become unresponsive or terminate abnormally.
Severity
6.2 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-25624"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-606"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-23T14:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Liquid Studio 2.17 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by providing malformed input through the keyboard interface. Attackers can trigger the vulnerability by entering arbitrary characters during application runtime, causing the application to become unresponsive or terminate abnormally.",
"id": "GHSA-2rv5-pwgg-7f73",
"modified": "2026-03-23T15:30:44Z",
"published": "2026-03-23T15:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-25624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46128"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/liquid-studio-denial-of-service-via-malformed-input"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.pixarra.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.pixarra.com/uploads/9/4/6/3/94635436/tbliquidstudio_install.exe"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Implementation
Do not use user-controlled data for loop conditions.
Mitigation
Implementation
Perform input validation.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.