CWE-307

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-50176",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-26T13:54:25.318175Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T13:54:38.340Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "EVoke CSMS",
          "vendor": "EVoke",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All versions",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Khaled Sarieddine and Mohammad Ali Sayed reported this vulnerability to CISA."
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-06-26T04:18:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks or brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access."
            }
          ],
          "value": "The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks or brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T20:58:29.541Z",
        "orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
        "shortName": "icscert"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://evokesystems.com/contact-us/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-176-02"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-176-02.json"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "EVoke states that as a hardware-agnostic platform supporting multiple charger Original Equipment Manufacturers OEMs, EVoke must interoperate with EVSE devices that support different OCPP security profiles depending on the firmware capabilities of the charger. EVoke CSMS currently supports all OCPP security profiles (0\u20133). However, the effective security configuration for a charger connection is determined by the security profile implemented in the EVSE firmware. Some legacy chargers deployed in the network support only Security Profile 0 or 1. These chargers were installed prior to the broader industry adoption of stronger authentication mechanisms defined in OCPP Security Profiles 2 and 3. EVoke is actively working with charger OEM partners to migrate supported devices to Security Profile 2 (TLS encryption with basic authentication) or Security Profile 3 (Mutual TLS authentication using client certificates). For OEMs that continue to support firmware updates, EVoke will prioritize upgrades to enable Security Profiles 2 or 3."
            }
          ],
          "value": "EVoke states that as a hardware-agnostic platform supporting multiple charger Original Equipment Manufacturers OEMs, EVoke must interoperate with EVSE devices that support different OCPP security profiles depending on the firmware capabilities of the charger. EVoke CSMS currently supports all OCPP security profiles (0\u20133). However, the effective security configuration for a charger connection is determined by the security profile implemented in the EVSE firmware. Some legacy chargers deployed in the network support only Security Profile 0 or 1. These chargers were installed prior to the broader industry adoption of stronger authentication mechanisms defined in OCPP Security Profiles 2 and 3. EVoke is actively working with charger OEM partners to migrate supported devices to Security Profile 2 (TLS encryption with basic authentication) or Security Profile 3 (Mutual TLS authentication using client certificates). For OEMs that continue to support firmware updates, EVoke will prioritize upgrades to enable Security Profiles 2 or 3."
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "EVoke states that certain legacy charger models deployed on the network are no longer supported by the manufacturer (for example, chargers originally produced by EVBox). These devices cannot be upgraded to support stronger security profiles. For chargers limited to Security Profiles 0 or 1, EVoke is implementing additional server-side protections to mitigate spoofing risks. Allow-listed chargers will only be accepted from chargers whose IDs are registered in the EVoke CSMS inventory database. Unknown charger identifiers will be rejected."
            }
          ],
          "value": "EVoke states that certain legacy charger models deployed on the network are no longer supported by the manufacturer (for example, chargers originally produced by EVBox). These devices cannot be upgraded to support stronger security profiles. For chargers limited to Security Profiles 0 or 1, EVoke is implementing additional server-side protections to mitigate spoofing risks. Allow-listed chargers will only be accepted from chargers whose IDs are registered in the EVoke CSMS inventory database. Unknown charger identifiers will be rejected."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "ICSA-26-176-02",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "EVoke Systems EVoke CSMS Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "EVoke states that to reduce the risk of duplicate sessions, only a single active connection per charger ID will be permitted. If a second connection using the same charger ID is detected, the new connection will be rejected or the previous session will be terminated. This prevents unauthorized actors from establishing parallel sessions using spoofed charger identifiers."
            }
          ],
          "value": "EVoke states that to reduce the risk of duplicate sessions, only a single active connection per charger ID will be permitted. If a second connection using the same charger ID is detected, the new connection will be rejected or the previous session will be terminated. This prevents unauthorized actors from establishing parallel sessions using spoofed charger identifiers."
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "EVoke states that the platform will monitor session anomalies including repeated connection attempts, unexpected IP address changes, and abnormal message patterns. Security events will be logged and flagged for operational review."
            }
          ],
          "value": "EVoke states that the platform will monitor session anomalies including repeated connection attempts, unexpected IP address changes, and abnormal message patterns. Security events will be logged and flagged for operational review."
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "EVoke states that to address the risk of denial-of-service via repeated authentication attempts, EVoke will implement connection rate limiting at the WebSocket gateway layer. These controls will restrict excessive connection attempts from the same source and temporarily block abusive traffic patterns."
            }
          ],
          "value": "EVoke states that to address the risk of denial-of-service via repeated authentication attempts, EVoke will implement connection rate limiting at the WebSocket gateway layer. These controls will restrict excessive connection attempts from the same source and temporarily block abusive traffic patterns."
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "EVoke states they are developing a lifecycle policy for legacy chargers that cannot support modern OCPP security profiles. This policy will include identification of unsupported EVSE models and risk classification Migration planning with site operators where possible"
            }
          ],
          "value": "EVoke states they are developing a lifecycle policy for legacy chargers that cannot support modern OCPP security profiles. This policy will include identification of unsupported EVSE models and risk classification Migration planning with site operators where possible"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
    "assignerShortName": "icscert",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-50176",
    "datePublished": "2026-06-25T20:58:29.541Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-18T19:23:06.058Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T13:54:38.340Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-49470",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-28T13:40:06.632907Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-28T13:40:15.230Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "glpi",
          "vendor": "glpi-project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 11.0.0, \u003c 11.0.8"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 11.0.0 until 11.0.8, the time-based one-time password verification endpoint does not limit failed submissions per user. An attacker who has obtained a user\u0027s primary authentication credentials can repeatedly submit TOTP values against the MFA verification flow, making brute-force compromise of the second factor and subsequent account takeover possible. This issue is fixed in version 11.0.8."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 7.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T18:30:55.981Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-mcv8-4hfg-5x2x",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-mcv8-4hfg-5x2x"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/19a0e81a2b09fee43b3e2a603639fc9b61360c73",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/19a0e81a2b09fee43b3e2a603639fc9b61360c73"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/releases/tag/11.0.8",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/releases/tag/11.0.8"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-mcv8-4hfg-5x2x",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "GLPI: Missing Rate Limiting on Login and TOTP Verification \u2014 Account Takeover via Brute Force"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-49470",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T18:30:55.981Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-30T04:17:43.094Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-28T13:40:15.230Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-49324",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-29T13:29:04.419365Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T13:29:20.081Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "modules": [
            "Wireless Control Module (WCM)"
          ],
          "platforms": [
            "OEM Motorcycle"
          ],
          "product": "Scout Bobber + Tech",
          "vendor": "Indian Motorcycle",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2025",
              "versionType": "model-year"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Scott Sheahan, Rustic Security LLC"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-05-29T15:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eUncontrolled resource consumption in the Wireless Control Module (WCM) of the Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech 2025 model year allows an adjacent-network attacker with write access to the in-vehicle network to permanently immobilize the motorcycle. The WCM enforces a brute-force lockout on the immobilizer authentication algorithm, but the lockout counter is reachable by any unauthenticated message, has no session binding, and does not reset on power cycle. An attacker can deliberately trip the lockout with a small number of crafted frames, leaving the bike un-startable until dealer service. Specific thresholds have been withheld pending vendor remediation.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Uncontrolled resource consumption in the Wireless Control Module (WCM) of the Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech 2025 model year allows an adjacent-network attacker with write access to the in-vehicle network to permanently immobilize the motorcycle. The WCM enforces a brute-force lockout on the immobilizer authentication algorithm, but the lockout counter is reachable by any unauthenticated message, has no session binding, and does not reset on power cycle. An attacker can deliberately trip the lockout with a small number of crafted frames, leaving the bike un-startable until dealer service. Specific thresholds have been withheld pending vendor remediation."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Inducing Account Lockout"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Sustained Client Engagement"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 4.6,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
            "baseScore": 4.1,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-400",
              "description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            },
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307 Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            },
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-770",
              "description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-27T08:47:06.626Z",
        "orgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
        "shortName": "ASRG"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.asrg.io/security-advisories/cve-2026-49324-indian-scout-wcm-bruteforce-lockout-dos"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eBind the brute-force counter to an authorized WCM\u2194ECM session token, rate-limit on a sliding window, and provide an owner-recoverable unlock path (e.g., PIN re-entry at the Digital Round) instead of dealer-only recovery.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Bind the brute-force counter to an authorized WCM\u2194ECM session token, rate-limit on a sliding window, and provide an owner-recoverable unlock path (e.g., PIN re-entry at the Digital Round) instead of dealer-only recovery."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-03-26T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Reported to Indian Motorcycle by Rustic Security LLC (responsible disclosure)"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Indian Scout Bobber 2025 WCM brute-force",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
    "assignerShortName": "ASRG",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-49324",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-29T12:32:51.615Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-29T07:26:43.199Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-27T08:47:06.626Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-48084",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-07T17:16:26.329156Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-07T17:17:03.030Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-hhg5-xmjg-3m93"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "appointment-booking-software",
          "vendor": "open-reception",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.0.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "OpenReception\u0027s appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Versions prior to 1.0.2 don\u0027t throttle failed passphrase login attempts. An attacker can submit unlimited wrong passphrase guesses against any known email address, capped only by the Argon2 verification cost (about 100 milliseconds per attempt on the tested host, giving 10 attempts per second sustained). The same backend implements a working per-account throttle on the WebAuthn challenge endpoint, which returns HTTP 429 after roughly 19 attempts. The passphrase branch simply does not invoke that throttle, leaving a supported high-value login path unprotected against credential stuffing and dictionary attacks. The asymmetry confirms this is an oversight rather than a design choice. The throttle infrastructure exists, is wired into the same auth backend, and works on the WebAuthn path. The passphrase branch in `/api/auth/login` was not updated to record failed attempts. Combined with the application\u0027s minimum-passphrase policy (12 characters, no entropy or dictionary checks), accounts using common base patterns such as `Spring2026!XX` or words from a leak corpus are realistically reachable in days on a single CPU, hours on a small GPU farm. Version 1.0.2 patches the issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.4,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T21:18:12.634Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-hhg5-xmjg-3m93",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-hhg5-xmjg-3m93"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/b283dbb670e09112299fb0cf89f3cb054ecc1700",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/b283dbb670e09112299fb0cf89f3cb054ecc1700"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-hhg5-xmjg-3m93",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "OpenReception doesn\u0027t rate limit passphrase login attempts"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-48084",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-06T21:18:12.634Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-20T18:40:45.832Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-07T17:17:03.030Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-48071",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-08T02:25:43.741761Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-08T02:26:36.396Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-f778-wf9x-3qf9"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "appointment-booking-software",
          "vendor": "open-reception",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.0.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "OpenReception\u0027s appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.4, the PIN-type challenge throttle uses `emailHash` as the only key. The throttle rows live in the central `challenge_throttle` table, which is shared across all tenants. Every tenant\u0027s `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/verify-challenge` endpoint increments the same row when a PIN response fails, and every tenant\u0027s `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/challenge` endpoint reads the same row when deciding whether to issue a new challenge. When the same `emailHash` exists in multiple tenants on the same OpenReception instance (the same patient holding tunnels in two different clinics that share the platform), an attacker who knows the patient\u0027s email can lock out that patient on tenant B by issuing failed challenge responses against tenant A. The attacker needs no relationship to tenant B; the lockout propagates through the shared throttle row. The lockout escalates with repeated failures. The first lockout triggers at 4 failed attempts and lasts approximately 60 seconds. Subsequent failures escalate the lockout duration to 5 minutes, 30 minutes, and 60 minutes per the throttle service\u0027s escalation logic. Repeated bursts produce sustained denial of service against the targeted email. Version 1.0.4 patches the issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "baseScore": 5.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T18:46:38.523Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-f778-wf9x-3qf9",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-f778-wf9x-3qf9"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/828b5297dc4c9827f7a43841d0f839c21462185d",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/828b5297dc4c9827f7a43841d0f839c21462185d"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-f778-wf9x-3qf9",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "OpenReception\u0027s client PIN challenge throttle is keyed by emailHash only, allowing cross-tenant lockout"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-48071",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-06T18:46:38.523Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-20T18:25:25.708Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-08T02:26:36.396Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-47380",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-24T12:29:58.244930Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T12:32:30.767Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "nocodb",
          "vendor": "nocodb",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 2026.04.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.04.1, sign-in response timing differed between known and unknown email addresses because the unknown-user branch returned without performing a password hash comparison. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.04.1."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-208",
              "description": "CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T20:33:27.730Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-jr54-jwhj-55gp",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-jr54-jwhj-55gp"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-jr54-jwhj-55gp",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "NocoDB: User Enumeration via Sign-In Timing"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-47380",
    "datePublished": "2026-06-23T20:33:27.730Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-19T19:22:45.728Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T12:32:30.767Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-47203",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-22T17:29:23.539472Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T18:13:48.660Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "authelia",
          "vendor": "authelia",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 4.38.0, \u003c 4.39.20"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Authelia is an open-source authentication and authorization server providing two-factor authentication and single sign-on (SSO) for applications via a web portal. In versions 4.38.0 through 4.39.19, when a user authenticates via Basic Auth (i.e via the `Authorization` header with the `Basic` scheme) on the authz verification endpoint, Authelia takes the username directly from the `Authorization` header and passes it as is to the regulation system for ban checking and attempt recording. LDAP treats usernames case insensitively : `john`, `John`, and `JOHN` all bind as the same user. But the regulation SQL queries treat the lookup of these values in certain scenarios as case sensitive. This allows each variation of a usernames case to have its own ban bucket. Upgrade to 4.39.20 to receive a patch. As a workaround, explicitly disable the basic auth mechanism."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 2.9,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-178",
              "description": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-19T20:19:47.903Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/authelia/authelia/security/advisories/GHSA-hjj4-hfjm-fmrj",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/authelia/authelia/security/advisories/GHSA-hjj4-hfjm-fmrj"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/authelia/authelia/commit/b8985b57b70acdff8f204ed426ff619e763461ad",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/authelia/authelia/commit/b8985b57b70acdff8f204ed426ff619e763461ad"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-hjj4-hfjm-fmrj",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Authelia Missing Username Canonicalization in Basic Auth (LDAP)"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-47203",
    "datePublished": "2026-06-19T20:19:47.903Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-18T22:07:37.436Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T18:13:48.660Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-46649",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-28T20:18:43.323006Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-28T20:18:49.471Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/security/advisories/GHSA-6vwc-4hrg-qp5h"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "joplin",
          "vendor": "laurent22",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 3.7.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Joplin is an open source note-taking and to-do application that organises notes and lists into notebooks. Prior to 3.7.2, Joplin Server\u0027s GET /api/login_with_code/:id endpoint accepts a nine-digit SSO authentication code with a ten-minute lifetime without applying limiterLoginBruteForce. An unauthenticated attacker who targets a user during an active SSO login can make unlimited guesses, and a correct code returns a full session token that permits access to and modification of the user\u0027s notes, notebooks, and account settings. This issue is fixed in version 3.7.2."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9.1,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T20:58:04.456Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/security/advisories/GHSA-6vwc-4hrg-qp5h",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/security/advisories/GHSA-6vwc-4hrg-qp5h"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/pull/15433",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/pull/15433"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/commit/fd8c1fb53f98f689e846dc164e39f307f09b684d",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/commit/fd8c1fb53f98f689e846dc164e39f307f09b684d"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/tree/v3.7.2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/tree/v3.7.2"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-6vwc-4hrg-qp5h",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Joplin: SSO Auth Code Login Missing Rate Limiting \u2014 9-Digit Numeric Code Brute-Forceable via Unprotected Endpoint"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-46649",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-21T20:58:04.456Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-15T20:11:54.585Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-28T20:18:49.471Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-45364",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-29T19:05:14.121201Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T19:05:38.845Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "better-auth",
          "vendor": "better-auth",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.4.17"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 1.5.0-beta.1, \u003c 1.5.0-beta.9"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.4.17 and 1.5.0-beta.9, Better Auth\u0027s HTTP rate limiter keyed each request by the exact textual IP address it received in x-forwarded-for (or the configured IP-bearing header). IPv6 clients controlling a typical /64 allocation could rotate through 2^64 distinct source addresses without exhausting the per-address counter, defeating rate limiting on /sign-in/email, /sign-up/email, /forget-password, and every other path the limiter protects. The same bug allowed a single client to vary the textual encoding of one IPv6 address (uppercase, compression, IPv4-mapped, hex-encoded IPv4-in-IPv6) and produce multiple distinct keys. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.17 and 1.5.0-beta.9."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "baseScore": 7.3,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T21:34:51.446Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-p6v2-xcpg-h6xw",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-p6v2-xcpg-h6xw"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/7470",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/7470"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/7509",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/7509"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/43e719bcc0c223c7079fa0c611a9cf7ea1188254",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/43e719bcc0c223c7079fa0c611a9cf7ea1188254"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/57af0f7b910dcf7b1a5c0615d10b9bd56bb69bef",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/57af0f7b910dcf7b1a5c0615d10b9bd56bb69bef"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-p6v2-xcpg-h6xw",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Better Auth: Rate limiter keys IPv6 addresses individually and is bypassable via prefix rotation"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-45364",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-28T21:34:51.446Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-12T00:51:29.085Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T19:05:38.845Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-45010",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-15T22:11:39.787082Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T22:22:06.593Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-9pq7-mfwh-xx2j"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "phpmyfaq",
          "vendor": "thorsten",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "4.1.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "4.1.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:phpmyfaq:phpmyfaq:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "4.1.2",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "adrgs"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "aisafe-bot"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-04-28T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in the /admin/check endpoint, which accepts arbitrary user-id parameters without session binding or rate limiting. Unauthenticated attackers can brute-force any user\u0027s six-digit TOTP code by submitting POST requests with sequential token values, bypassing two-factor authentication to gain full administrative access."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 9.1,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9.3,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:15:22.666Z",
        "orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
        "shortName": "VulnCheck"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "GHSA Advisory GHSA-9pq7-mfwh-xx2j",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-9pq7-mfwh-xx2j"
        },
        {
          "name": "VulnCheck Advisory: phpMyFAQ - Unauthenticated Two-Factor Authentication Brute-Force via /admin/check Endpoint",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/phpmyfaq-unauthenticated-two-factor-authentication-brute-force-via-admin-check-endpoint"
        }
      ],
      "title": "phpMyFAQ - Unauthenticated Two-Factor Authentication Brute-Force via /admin/check Endpoint",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "vulncheck"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
    "assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-45010",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-15T18:36:37.522Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-08T16:43:53.068Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:15:22.666Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}