Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-306

Allowed

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

API response cwe.mitre.org

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

4625 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-GFC8-6QCC-3MVM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-16 15:32 – Updated: 2025-10-21 12:31
VLAI
Details

BIG-IP monitor functionality may allow an attacker to bypass access control restrictions, regardless of the port lockdown settings.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Severity
7.2 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
8.6 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-45844"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-16T15:15:16Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "BIG-IP monitor functionality may allow an attacker to bypass access control restrictions, regardless of the port lockdown settings.\u00a0 Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfc8-6qcc-3mvm",
  "modified": "2025-10-21T12:31:20Z",
  "published": "2024-10-16T15:32:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45844"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000140061"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://offsec.almond.consulting/privilege-escalation-f5-CVE-2024-45844.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GFCM-5MP4-VVXW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-22 00:31
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Development product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Siebel Approval Manager). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Development. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Development. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-47036"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T22:17:09Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Development product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Siebel Approval Manager).  Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Development.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Development. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
  "id": "GHSA-gfcm-5mp4-vvxw",
  "modified": "2026-07-22T00:31:16Z",
  "published": "2026-07-22T00:31:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47036"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GFGH-QXJ6-4755

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-17 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-29 00:01
VLAI
Details

When connecting to a certain port Axeda agent (All versions) and Axeda Desktop Server for Windows (All versions) may allow an attacker to send a certain command to a specific port without authentication. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to shut down a specific service.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-25250"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-16T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "When connecting to a certain port Axeda agent (All versions) and Axeda Desktop Server for Windows (All versions) may allow an attacker to send a certain command to a specific port without authentication. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to shut down a specific service.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfgh-qxj6-4755",
  "modified": "2022-03-29T00:01:39Z",
  "published": "2022-03-17T00:00:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25250"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-067-01"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS363561"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GFMV-VH34-H2X5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-03 21:42 – Updated: 2026-04-06 23:13
VLAI
Summary
Signal K Server: Unauthenticated Source Priorities Manipulation
Details

Summary

The SignalK Server exposes an unauthenticated HTTP endpoint that allows remote attackers to modify navigation data source priorities. This endpoint, accessible via PUT /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities, does not enforce authentication or authorization checks and directly assigns user-controlled input to the server configuration.

As a result, attackers can influence which GPS, AIS, or other sensor data sources are trusted by the system. The changes are immediately applied and persisted to disk, allowing the manipulation to survive server restarts.

Affected Component

  • File: src/serverroutes.ts
  • Endpoint: PUT /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities (also accessible at /skServer/sourcePriorities)
  • Lines: 1064-1076
  • Function: Source priorities configuration handler

Vulnerable Code

// src/serverroutes.ts - Lines 1064-1076
app.put(
  `${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/sourcePriorities`,
  (req: Request, res: Response) => {
    app.config.settings.sourcePriorities = req.body
    app.activateSourcePriorities()
    writeSettingsFile(app, app.config.settings, (err: any) => {
      if (err) {
        res
          .status(500)
          .send('Unable to save to sourcePrefences in settings file')
      } else {
        res.json({ result: 'ok' })
      }
    })
  }
)

Vulnerability Characteristics

Missing Authentication: The endpoint has zero authentication middleware, allowing unauthenticated access from any network-adjacent attacker.

Direct Configuration Assignment: User-supplied request body is directly assigned to app.config.settings.sourcePriorities without validation or sanitization.

Persistent Storage: Malicious configuration is written to disk via writeSettingsFile(), ensuring changes survive server restarts. Live Configuration Update: Changes take effect immediately via activateSourcePriorities(), affecting live navigation data processing.

No Input Validation: No JSON schema validation, type checking, or field allowlisting is performed on the request body.

Impact

  • Navigation Data Manipulation: Attackers can modify source priorities to change which existing, active source's data is being used
Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
6.9 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "signalk-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.24.0-beta.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33951"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-03T21:42:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-02T17:16:23Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nThe SignalK Server exposes an unauthenticated HTTP endpoint that allows remote attackers to modify navigation data source priorities. This endpoint, accessible via `PUT /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities`, does not enforce authentication or authorization checks and directly assigns user-controlled input to the server configuration.\n\nAs a result, attackers can influence which GPS, AIS, or other sensor data sources are trusted by the system. The changes are immediately applied and persisted to disk, allowing the manipulation to survive server restarts.\n\n### Affected Component\n- **File**: `src/serverroutes.ts`\n- **Endpoint**: `PUT /signalk/v1/api/sourcePriorities` (also accessible at `/skServer/sourcePriorities`)\n- **Lines**: 1064-1076\n- **Function**: Source priorities configuration handler\n\n### Vulnerable Code\n\n```typescript\n// src/serverroutes.ts - Lines 1064-1076\napp.put(\n  `${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/sourcePriorities`,\n  (req: Request, res: Response) =\u003e {\n    app.config.settings.sourcePriorities = req.body\n    app.activateSourcePriorities()\n    writeSettingsFile(app, app.config.settings, (err: any) =\u003e {\n      if (err) {\n        res\n          .status(500)\n          .send(\u0027Unable to save to sourcePrefences in settings file\u0027)\n      } else {\n        res.json({ result: \u0027ok\u0027 })\n      }\n    })\n  }\n)\n```\n## Vulnerability Characteristics\n\n**Missing Authentication**: The endpoint has zero authentication middleware, allowing unauthenticated access from any network-adjacent attacker.\n\n**Direct Configuration Assignment**: User-supplied request body is directly assigned to app.config.settings.sourcePriorities without validation or sanitization.\n\n**Persistent Storage**: Malicious configuration is written to disk via writeSettingsFile(), ensuring changes survive server restarts.\n**Live Configuration Update**: Changes take effect immediately via activateSourcePriorities(), affecting live navigation data processing.\n\n**No Input Validation**: No JSON schema validation, type checking, or field allowlisting is performed on the request body.\n\n## Impact\n- **Navigation Data Manipulation**: Attackers can modify source priorities to change which existing, active source\u0027s data is being used",
  "id": "GHSA-gfmv-vh34-h2x5",
  "modified": "2026-04-06T23:13:11Z",
  "published": "2026-04-03T21:42:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SignalK/signalk-server/security/advisories/GHSA-gfmv-vh34-h2x5"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33951"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/SignalK/signalk-server"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SignalK/signalk-server/releases/tag/v2.24.0-beta.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Signal K Server: Unauthenticated Source Priorities Manipulation "
}

GHSA-GFQ8-HMPH-9GJV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-25 15:15 – Updated: 2026-08-25 15:15
VLAI
Summary
PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret
Details

Summary

The PraisonAI Recipe HTTP server silently allows unauthenticated requests when auth is configured as api-key or jwt but the corresponding secret is missing.

This creates an authentication fail-open condition. An operator can start the Recipe server with authentication enabled, including on a non-localhost interface, but the server still accepts unauthenticated requests if no API key or JWT secret is provided.

The issue is especially risky because the CLI safety check for non-localhost binding only verifies that auth != "none". It does not verify that an actual API key or JWT secret exists.

Details

The Recipe server documents the following authentication modes:

  • none
  • api-key
  • jwt

Relevant source locations:

  • src/praisonai/praisonai/recipe/serve.py
  • src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/recipe.py

In create_auth_middleware(), the API key middleware resolves the expected key as:

expected_key = api_key or os.environ.get("PRAISONAI_API_KEY")

if not expected_key:
    # No key configured, allow request
    return await call_next(request)

This means auth: api-key does not enforce authentication if api_key / PRAISONAI_API_KEY is missing.

The JWT middleware has the same fail-open behavior:

secret = jwt_secret or os.environ.get("PRAISONAI_JWT_SECRET")
if not secret:
    return await call_next(request)

The auth middleware is still attached when auth is configured:

auth_type = config.get("auth")
if auth_type and auth_type != "none":
    auth_middleware = create_auth_middleware(
        auth_type,
        api_key=config.get("api_key"),
        jwt_secret=config.get("jwt_secret"),
    )
    if auth_middleware:
        middleware.append(Middleware(auth_middleware))

The CLI path makes this externally reachable in a misconfigured deployment. In cmd_serve, the non-localhost safety check only verifies that auth is not "none":

if host != "127.0.0.1" and host != "localhost" and auth == "none":
    self._print_error("Auth required for non-localhost binding. Use --auth api-key or --auth jwt")
    return self.EXIT_POLICY_DENIED

Therefore, this command passes the safety check:

praisonai recipe serve --host 0.0.0.0 --auth api-key

However, if no --api-key or PRAISONAI_API_KEY is configured, requests are still accepted without authentication.

Affected endpoints include:

  • POST /v1/recipes/run
  • POST /v1/recipes/stream
  • POST /v1/recipes/validate
  • optional POST /admin/reload when enable_admin is true

PoC

The following local PoC verifies that api-key and jwt authentication fail open when the corresponding secret is missing.

Run from the repository root with test dependencies installed:

python3 poc_recipe_auth_fail_open.py

poc_recipe_auth_fail_open.py:

import os
import sys
from pathlib import Path

from starlette.testclient import TestClient

ROOT = Path.cwd()
sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / "src" / "praisonai"))
sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / "src" / "praisonai-agents"))

# Ensure no secrets are present in the environment.
os.environ.pop("PRAISONAI_API_KEY", None)
os.environ.pop("PRAISONAI_JWT_SECRET", None)

from praisonai.recipe.serve import create_app

# api-key auth selected, but no key configured.
app_open = create_app({"auth": "api-key", "enable_admin": True})
client_open = TestClient(app_open)

print("api-key auth with missing key:")
print("GET /openapi.json:", client_open.get("/openapi.json").status_code)
print("POST /admin/reload:", client_open.post("/admin/reload").status_code)

# api-key auth selected with an actual key configured.
app_closed = create_app({
    "auth": "api-key",
    "api_key": "expected",
    "enable_admin": True,
})
client_closed = TestClient(app_closed)

print("\napi-key auth with configured key:")
print("missing key:", client_closed.post("/admin/reload").status_code)
print("wrong key:", client_closed.post(
    "/admin/reload",
    headers={"X-API-Key": "wrong"},
).status_code)
print("correct key:", client_closed.post(
    "/admin/reload",
    headers={"X-API-Key": "expected"},
).status_code)

# jwt auth selected, but no JWT secret configured.
app_jwt_open = create_app({"auth": "jwt"})
client_jwt_open = TestClient(app_jwt_open)

print("\njwt auth with missing secret:")
print("GET /openapi.json:", client_jwt_open.get("/openapi.json").status_code)

Observed output:

api-key auth with missing key:
GET /openapi.json: 200
POST /admin/reload: 200

api-key auth with configured key:
missing key: 401
wrong key: 401
correct key: 200

jwt auth with missing secret:
GET /openapi.json: 200

The important result is that auth=api-key without a configured key allows requests to protected endpoints, while the same endpoint correctly returns 401 when a key is configured and missing/wrong.

Impact

In an exposed deployment, an unauthenticated attacker can access Recipe server endpoints even though the operator selected api-key or jwt authentication.

This gives unauthenticated access to recipe execution endpoints such as:

  • POST /v1/recipes/run
  • POST /v1/recipes/stream

If admin endpoints are enabled, the attacker can also access:

  • POST /admin/reload

The impact depends on the available recipes and deployment configuration. In the worst case, unauthenticated users can trigger recipe workflows or administrative reload operations on an externally bound Recipe server.

Severity
8.2 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "PraisonAI"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.6.58"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-55533"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-25T15:15:54Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe PraisonAI Recipe HTTP server silently allows unauthenticated requests when `auth` is configured as `api-key` or `jwt` but the corresponding secret is missing.\n\nThis creates an authentication fail-open condition. An operator can start the Recipe server with authentication enabled, including on a non-localhost interface, but the server still accepts unauthenticated requests if no API key or JWT secret is provided.\n\nThe issue is especially risky because the CLI safety check for non-localhost binding only verifies that `auth != \"none\"`. It does not verify that an actual API key or JWT secret exists.\n\n### Details\n\nThe Recipe server documents the following authentication modes:\n\n- `none`\n- `api-key`\n- `jwt`\n\nRelevant source locations:\n\n- `src/praisonai/praisonai/recipe/serve.py`\n- `src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/recipe.py`\n\nIn `create_auth_middleware()`, the API key middleware resolves the expected key as:\n\n```python\nexpected_key = api_key or os.environ.get(\"PRAISONAI_API_KEY\")\n\nif not expected_key:\n    # No key configured, allow request\n    return await call_next(request)\n```\n\nThis means `auth: api-key` does not enforce authentication if `api_key` / `PRAISONAI_API_KEY` is missing.\n\nThe JWT middleware has the same fail-open behavior:\n\n```python\nsecret = jwt_secret or os.environ.get(\"PRAISONAI_JWT_SECRET\")\nif not secret:\n    return await call_next(request)\n```\n\nThe auth middleware is still attached when `auth` is configured:\n\n```python\nauth_type = config.get(\"auth\")\nif auth_type and auth_type != \"none\":\n    auth_middleware = create_auth_middleware(\n        auth_type,\n        api_key=config.get(\"api_key\"),\n        jwt_secret=config.get(\"jwt_secret\"),\n    )\n    if auth_middleware:\n        middleware.append(Middleware(auth_middleware))\n```\n\nThe CLI path makes this externally reachable in a misconfigured deployment. In `cmd_serve`, the non-localhost safety check only verifies that auth is not `\"none\"`:\n\n```python\nif host != \"127.0.0.1\" and host != \"localhost\" and auth == \"none\":\n    self._print_error(\"Auth required for non-localhost binding. Use --auth api-key or --auth jwt\")\n    return self.EXIT_POLICY_DENIED\n```\n\nTherefore, this command passes the safety check:\n\n```bash\npraisonai recipe serve --host 0.0.0.0 --auth api-key\n```\n\nHowever, if no `--api-key` or `PRAISONAI_API_KEY` is configured, requests are still accepted without authentication.\n\nAffected endpoints include:\n\n- `POST /v1/recipes/run`\n- `POST /v1/recipes/stream`\n- `POST /v1/recipes/validate`\n- optional `POST /admin/reload` when `enable_admin` is true\n\n### PoC\n\nThe following local PoC verifies that `api-key` and `jwt` authentication fail open when the corresponding secret is missing.\n\nRun from the repository root with test dependencies installed:\n\n```bash\npython3 poc_recipe_auth_fail_open.py\n```\n\n`poc_recipe_auth_fail_open.py`:\n\n```python\nimport os\nimport sys\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nfrom starlette.testclient import TestClient\n\nROOT = Path.cwd()\nsys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / \"src\" / \"praisonai\"))\nsys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / \"src\" / \"praisonai-agents\"))\n\n# Ensure no secrets are present in the environment.\nos.environ.pop(\"PRAISONAI_API_KEY\", None)\nos.environ.pop(\"PRAISONAI_JWT_SECRET\", None)\n\nfrom praisonai.recipe.serve import create_app\n\n# api-key auth selected, but no key configured.\napp_open = create_app({\"auth\": \"api-key\", \"enable_admin\": True})\nclient_open = TestClient(app_open)\n\nprint(\"api-key auth with missing key:\")\nprint(\"GET /openapi.json:\", client_open.get(\"/openapi.json\").status_code)\nprint(\"POST /admin/reload:\", client_open.post(\"/admin/reload\").status_code)\n\n# api-key auth selected with an actual key configured.\napp_closed = create_app({\n    \"auth\": \"api-key\",\n    \"api_key\": \"expected\",\n    \"enable_admin\": True,\n})\nclient_closed = TestClient(app_closed)\n\nprint(\"\\napi-key auth with configured key:\")\nprint(\"missing key:\", client_closed.post(\"/admin/reload\").status_code)\nprint(\"wrong key:\", client_closed.post(\n    \"/admin/reload\",\n    headers={\"X-API-Key\": \"wrong\"},\n).status_code)\nprint(\"correct key:\", client_closed.post(\n    \"/admin/reload\",\n    headers={\"X-API-Key\": \"expected\"},\n).status_code)\n\n# jwt auth selected, but no JWT secret configured.\napp_jwt_open = create_app({\"auth\": \"jwt\"})\nclient_jwt_open = TestClient(app_jwt_open)\n\nprint(\"\\njwt auth with missing secret:\")\nprint(\"GET /openapi.json:\", client_jwt_open.get(\"/openapi.json\").status_code)\n```\n\nObserved output:\n\n```text\napi-key auth with missing key:\nGET /openapi.json: 200\nPOST /admin/reload: 200\n\napi-key auth with configured key:\nmissing key: 401\nwrong key: 401\ncorrect key: 200\n\njwt auth with missing secret:\nGET /openapi.json: 200\n```\n\nThe important result is that `auth=api-key` without a configured key allows requests to protected endpoints, while the same endpoint correctly returns `401` when a key is configured and missing/wrong.\n\n### Impact\n\nIn an exposed deployment, an unauthenticated attacker can access Recipe server endpoints even though the operator selected `api-key` or `jwt` authentication.\n\nThis gives unauthenticated access to recipe execution endpoints such as:\n\n- `POST /v1/recipes/run`\n- `POST /v1/recipes/stream`\n\nIf admin endpoints are enabled, the attacker can also access:\n\n- `POST /admin/reload`\n\nThe impact depends on the available recipes and deployment configuration. In the worst case, unauthenticated users can trigger recipe workflows or administrative reload operations on an externally bound Recipe server.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfq8-hmph-9gjv",
  "modified": "2026-08-25T15:15:54Z",
  "published": "2026-08-25T15:15:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-gfq8-hmph-9gjv"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/releases/tag/v4.6.58"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret"
}

GHSA-GFVG-Q74F-527Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-09 18:31 – Updated: 2026-01-09 18:31
VLAI
Details

The Ruckus vRIoT IoT Controller firmware versions prior to 3.0.0.0 (GA) expose a command execution service on TCP port 2004 running with root privileges. Authentication to this service relies on a hardcoded Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP) secret and an embedded static token. An attacker who extracts these credentials from the appliance or a compromised device can generate valid authentication tokens and execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges, resulting in complete system compromise.

Severity
10.0 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-69425"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-09T17:15:53Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The Ruckus vRIoT IoT Controller\u00a0firmware versions prior to 3.0.0.0 (GA) expose a command execution service on TCP port 2004 running with root privileges. Authentication to this service relies on a hardcoded Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP) secret and an embedded static token. An attacker who extracts these credentials from the appliance or a compromised device can generate valid authentication tokens and execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges, resulting in complete system compromise.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfvg-q74f-527q",
  "modified": "2026-01-09T18:31:37Z",
  "published": "2026-01-09T18:31:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69425"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.ruckuswireless.com/security_bulletins/336"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ruckus-vriot-iot-controller-hardcoded-tokens-rce"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GFVR-MX87-VW5J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-22 00:31
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0, 14.1.1.0.0, 14.1.2.0.0 and 15.1.1.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via SOAP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-60294"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T22:17:31Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core).  Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0, 14.1.1.0.0, 14.1.2.0.0 and  15.1.1.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via SOAP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
  "id": "GHSA-gfvr-mx87-vw5j",
  "modified": "2026-07-22T00:31:31Z",
  "published": "2026-07-22T00:31:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-60294"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GFWX-437H-G22Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-07 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-07 15:31
VLAI
Details

Missing authentication has been found in remote-execution task updates in the smart_proxy_dynflow package. The progress and completion callbacks accept a report when the one-time token is missing. A network attacker or user must already know the identifier of a running job. This applies when remote execution is set to pull or pull-mqtt mode. They can send their own job output and mark the job as a success or a failure. The job is then recorded with that result.

Severity
5.9 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-107151"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-07T13:17:19Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing authentication has been found in remote-execution task updates in the smart_proxy_dynflow package. The progress and completion callbacks accept a report when the one-time token is missing. A network attacker or user must already know the identifier of a running job. This applies when remote execution is set to pull or pull-mqtt mode. They can send their own job output and mark the job as a success or a failure. The job is then recorded with that result.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfwx-437h-g22q",
  "modified": "2026-10-07T15:31:56Z",
  "published": "2026-10-07T15:31:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-107151"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-107151"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2547357"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GG49-9MRV-FF3F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-29 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-29 12:31
VLAI
Details

An authentication bypass vulnerability in the firmware update endpoint of Hitachi Energy RTU500 allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary firmware through a crafted POST request. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to modify device functionality or compromise the integrity or availability of the device.

Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-8065"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-29T10:17:13Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An authentication bypass vulnerability in the firmware update endpoint of Hitachi Energy RTU500 allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary firmware through a crafted POST request. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to modify device functionality or compromise the integrity or availability of the device.",
  "id": "GHSA-gg49-9mrv-ff3f",
  "modified": "2026-09-29T12:31:30Z",
  "published": "2026-09-29T12:31:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-8065"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentID=8DBD000251\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=\u0026Action=Launch"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GG5H-M9WX-57XR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-15 00:30 – Updated: 2025-11-15 00:30
VLAI
Details

General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway  is missing critical authentication in the embedded web server which could allow an attacker to remotely reset the device.

Severity
10.0 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.2 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-58083"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-15T00:15:47Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "General Industrial Controls Lynx+ Gateway\u00a0\n is missing critical authentication in the embedded web server which could allow an attacker to remotely reset the device.",
  "id": "GHSA-gg5h-m9wx-57xr",
  "modified": "2025-11-15T00:30:26Z",
  "published": "2025-11-15T00:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58083"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2025/icsa-25-317-08.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-317-08"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
  • Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
  • In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design

For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
  • In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Mitigation MIT-4.5
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Mitigation
Implementation System Configuration Operation

When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

CAPEC-12: Choosing Message Identifier

This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.

CAPEC-166: Force the System to Reset Values

An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions.

CAPEC-216: Communication Channel Manipulation

An adversary manipulates a setting or parameter on communications channel in order to compromise its security. This can result in information exposure, insertion/removal of information from the communications stream, and/or potentially system compromise.

CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality

An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.

← Back to the CWE list